survey

/in /by

Reflect upon the survey you took. In your initial response, address some of the following questions. Explain your answers.

  • Did you find it easy to make confident and decisive decisions with several strongly agree or strongly disagree answers, or did you select mostly moderate responses?
  • Did any subject areas trigger personal emotions or issues?  If so, do you feel you were able to remain objective? 
  • Were any of the decisions especially difficult to make?
  • Did you employ any critical thinking or resolution strategies to determine a response?
  • Did you rely on policy or legal parameters to make your decisions? 
  • Would you be comfortable making your answers to the survey public, or do you prefer anonymity?
  • Have you dealt with similar situations and could you perceive similar situations occurring in your clinical practice?
  • How might a moral inventory such as this survey impact your clinical practice?

Please share additional thoughts as well.

Measures to Prevent Cancere

/in /by

due 10- 6-23 @ 10 am

The development of nursing knowledge

/in /by

The development of nursing knowledge is an ongoing process. Discuss the case for the ongoing development and use of nursing grand theories and conversely, make a case for the obsolescence of nursing grand theories for today’s practice and research.

At least 3 scholarly references no later than 5 years old. 

No Plagiarism 

I'm back part 3

/in /by

Needing assistance with this assignment 

Individual Rights & Vaccination Policy

/in /by

 

School board trustees are requesting public comment before they vote on a vaccination policy for all children in a local school district. Should individual rights (e.g., parents’ rights to decide whether to vaccinate their children) be compromised to control the spread of communicable diseases for the good of society? 

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

wk3691B

/in /by

1

This assignment and the following two months' work should be written related to your

previous writing. You should not change the stories. Then I will lose the points(scores). If

you talked about improvement of patient flow in the urgent care setting, your next

writing should be something similar with the previous style. I mean you should not write

about totally different topics like cancer patient management or something like that. If

you have any questions, you can ask me. I can give you enough time to complete it. One

week for this job.

Pls read your previous writings. Keep these links unless you remember about your

previous writings.

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473292317

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473883197

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473172845

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/473003787

https://www.sweetstudy.com/thread/472667933

2

Week 3: Recommendations and Conclusions

This part of your paper includes the summary of the project, main points and findings,
the significance of the project to the advanced practice nursing profession, and
recommendations for future research. Address the following:

1. Address your recommendations and implications for clinical practice.
2. Provide a summary of study and discuss any limitations of the study.
• Suggest directions for future research.
• Consider changes in theoretical constructs
• Provide suggestions for public policy and/or changes in practice.
3. Tie the theoretical framework to the overall product.
4. Conclude with an overall wrap-up to the paper.

Your paper should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
You must reference a minimum of two scholarly sources in your paper.

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Recommendations and Conclusions

NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Recommendations and Conclusions

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome Content
59.5 to >48.79 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides an insightful and thorough summary of

the project, main points, and findings, and details

the significance of the project to the advanced

practice nursing profession. Provides detailed

and creative recommendations for future

research and implications for clinical practice.

Discusses limitations of the study in detail.

Suggests specific directions for future research.

Insightfully considers changes in theoretical

construct and provides reasonable and creative

suggestions for public policy and/or changes in

educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical

framework to the overall product. Meets all of

the criteria of the written assignment.

59.5 pts

3

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome

Organization

7 to >5.74 pts

Meets Expectations

Content is well written throughout. Information

is well organized and clearly communicated.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome APA Format

and Mechanics

3.5 to >2.87 pts

Meets Expectations

All the requirements related to format, length,

source citations, and layout are followed. The

assignment is free of spelling and grammatical

errors.

3.5 pts

Total Points: 70

PreviousNext

4

  • Week 3: Recommendations and Conclusions

ARE

/in /by

Patient Data for NR226 RUA Patient:

Patient History:

Ben Smith is a 75-year-old retired farmer from Southern Illinois. He is widowed and has 3 adult children who live
out of state. He is in an LTC for rehab following hospitalization. He has a 60-year history of smoking 2 PPD of
cigarettes. He fell 3 months prior to his hospitalization but did not sustain any injuries.

He was admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of COPD. He also has a history of COVID in 2020,
HTN, and anxiety.

Medications:

• Acetaminophen 325mg PO Q6 hours PRN
• Albuterol inhaler, 2 puffs once daily
• Ipratropium bromide nebulizer Q8 hours PRN
• Lorazepam 5mg PO Q12 hours
• Nicotine patch, change every 72 hours
• Prednisone 30mg PO BID
• Multivitamin daily

Labs:

• Sputum culture and sensitivity- results showed no infection
• UA/UC- WNL
• CMP- WNL, except for potassium of 3.4 mEq/L
• CBC- WNL, except for platelets of 140k/mL

Imaging:

• Chest x-ray: shows focal consolidation in right lower lobe, suggestive of pneumonia
• Hyperinflation of lungs with flattened diaphragm consistent with long-standing COPD
• EKG: normal sinus rhythm with rate of 90 bpm

Assessment Data:

• Please be sure to fill in each system, including normal findings
• I will allow you to “make up” data that you would think would be abnormal in a patient like this, think of

findings especially in the following systems:
o Respiratory, cardiac, musculoskeletal, neuro

• Vital signs:
o Temp: 100.6 F, PO
o RR: 22 breaths/min, shallow
o HR: 90 bpm, regular
o BP: 145/90
o O2: 91% on 2L NC
o Pain: 7/10, intermittent, chest and upper back

Miscellaneous:

• The patient states that he hates hospitals and doesn’t belong in a nursing home. He says he needs to
get back to his farm

• He is impulsive and has tried to get out of bed numerous times, even though he is a stand by assist with
a history of falls

• He is non-compliant with medications and has felt nauseated. He does not want to take any meds and
“does not need that dang breathing thingy- it’s stupid!” (The nebulizer)

• He states he “will not quit smoking, I’ve been smoking since I was 15 and it hasn’t killed me yet!”

the components of Gordon’s functional health patterns as it applies to toddlers.

/in /by

Compare and contrast the growth and developmental patterns of two toddlers of different ages using Gordon’s functional health patterns. Describe and apply the components of Gordon’s functional health patterns as it applies to toddlers.  

500 words discusion

2 APA 7 citation  and references

Oncologic emergencies

/in /by

 

Instructions

Read the article, “Oncologic emergencies in a cancer center emergency department and in general emergency departments countywide and nationwide”.  You may access the article in the resource folder. 

Thoroughly review the complete research article exploring the management of oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED). Focus on patient characteristics, diagnoses, and factors influencing hospitalization.

Your case study should demonstrate a thorough grasp of the entire article, using specific details to support your points. This assignment aims to assess your ability to distill complex medical information into a focused case study, highlighting essential strategies for managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients. 

Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.  

Case Study Focus:

Based on your comprehensive reading, create a Case study highlighting key strategies for effectively managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients.

Key Points

Resource Optimization: Explain how increased resource utilization and hospitalization rates among cancer patients impact healthcare delivery. Discuss strategies to optimize resources while maintaining high quality care.

Timely Diagnosis: Emphasize the importance of timely diagnosis and intervention. Provide examples from the article illustrating the benefits of early recognition and swift treatment.

Tailored Interventions: Explore the concept of tailoring treatments to individual oncologic conditions. Share insights on customizing interventions based on diagnoses outlined in the article.

Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Discuss the value of multidisciplinary collaboration in managing critically ill patients. Describe how different specialties can work together for comprehensive patient care.

Risk Stratification: Explain the role of risk assessment in identifying high-risk patients and the significance of early interventions to prevent complications.

Education and Training: Address the impact of education and training on enhancing oncologic emergencies management. Highlight the benefits of well informed healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: Summarize key insights from the article and emphasize the patient centered approach to managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients.

discussion 6 div

/in /by

 

Hyde Pfiefer, a retired 70-year-old German American, has lived in the United States for the last 50 years. A widower of 5 years, Mr. Pfiefer prepares his own meals following his wife’s recipes from the old country. Nine months ago, Mr. Pfiefer was told that his cholesterol is elevated, and he was instructed about a low-fat diet. His most recent test results show his values to be unchanged.

  1. Discuss the meaning of food in the German culture.
  2. Using the predominant health beliefs of people of German ancestry, how might you help Mr. Pfiefer reduce his cholesterol level?

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.
  • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) 
  • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
  • Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
  • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.