see below

see below

BRAIN DEATH DISCUSSION

see attached file for detail scenarios and questions 

W4-5

 

Sometimes when we are in school learning advanced concepts, things can seem a bit abstract until we are able to see or experience concrete examples.  The link below is a short talk by Ricardo Fernandez, a Spaniard, who leads a team of up to 30 people from several different countries, and the communication challenges associated with this international remote working team.  He is not an expert, nor an academic, but he has the kind of practical experience that is useful for a discussion…and for your potential similar encounters.

Ricardo Fernandez on remote international teams (13:14)

After reviewing the video consider the following:

  • Evaluate the video for the communication skills needed for success in managing a global environment.
  • Evaluate video for the relationship-building skills needed for success in managing a remote team.
  • Analyze how cultural diversity and specifically inclusion impact effective management communication. In the context of managing different cultures, ages, and genders what modes of communication seem most effective in managing people?  Provide examples; for instance, would texting the terms of a new contract be the best way to communicate with a 60-year-old Japanese customer?

Create a 2-3 minute video explaining your analysis of the video covering the points above and post a written summary of your analysis as well in the discussion. The written summary must be supported with in-text citations and a reference list.

You can use one of the helpful links below to capture your video; consider including other visuals such as slides, diagrams, etc. this does not have to be just you talking.

Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Public health interventions (population-based)

Minnesota Department of Health. (2019). Public health interventions: Applications for public health nursing practice (2nd ed.).

P U B L I C H E A L T H I N T E R V E N T I O N S , D E F I N I T I O N S , A N D P R A C T I C E L E V E L S

2

Public health interventions, defined
Interventions are actions that public health nurses take on behalf of individuals/families, communities, and systems,
to improve or protect health status (Minnesota Department of Health, 2001, p. 1).

 Surveillance is “an ongoing, systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of health-related data essential to
the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice” (World Health Organization, 2018).

 Disease and health event investigation systematically gathers and analyzes data regarding threats to the health
of populations, ascertains the source of the threat, identifies cases and others at risk, and determines control
measures.

 Outreach locates populations of interest or populations at risk and provides information about the nature of the
concern, what can be done about it, and how to obtain services.

 Screening identifies individuals with unrecognized health risk factors or asymptomatic disease conditions in
populations.

 Case-finding locates individuals and families with identified risk factors and connects them to resources.

 Referral makes a connection to necessary resources to prevent or resolve problems or concerns. Follow-up
assesses outcomes related to the utilization of the resources.

 Case management is a collaborative process of assessment, planning, facilitation, care coordination, evaluation,
and advocacy for options and services to meet client needs. It uses communication and available resources to
promote safety, quality of care, and cost-effective outcomes.

 Delegated functions include: 1) direct care tasks a registered professional nurse carries out under the authority
of a health care practitioner, as allowed by law, and 2) direct care tasks a registered professional nurse entrusts
to other appropriate personnel to perform.

 Health teaching involves sharing information and experiences through educational activities designed to
improve health knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and skills (Friedman, Cosby, Boyko, Hatton-Bauer, & Turnbull,
2011).

 Counseling involves establishing an interpersonal relationship at an emotional level, with the goal of increased
or enhanced capacity for self-care and coping.

 Consultation seeks information and generates optimal solutions to perceived problems or issues through
interactive problem-solving.

 Collaboration enhances the capacity to promote and protect health for mutual benefit and a common purpose.
Collaboration involves exchanging information, harmonized activities, and shared resources (National Business
Coalition on Health, 2008).

 Coalition-building helps promote and develop alliances among organizations or constituencies for a common
purpose. It builds links, solves problems, and/or enhances local leadership to address health concerns.

 Community organizing is “the process by which people come together to identify common problems or goals,
mobilize resources, and develop and implement strategies for reaching the objectives they want to accomplish”
(Center for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas, 2017).

 Advocacy is the act of promoting and protecting the health of individuals and communities “by collaborating
with relevant stakeholders, facilitating access to health and social services, and actively engaging key decision-
makers to support and enact policies to improve community health outcomes” (Ezeonwu, 2015, p. 123).

 Social marketing is a process “that uses marketing principles and techniques to change target audience
behaviors to benefit society as well as the individual” (Lee & Kotler, 2016, p. 9).

 Policy development places health issues on decision-makers’ agendas, establishes a plan of resolution,
determines needed resources, and results in laws, rules and regulations, ordinances, and policies. Policy
enforcement compels others to comply with the laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, and policies created in
conjunction with policy development.

P U B L I C H E A L T H I N T E R V E N T I O N S , D E F I N I T I O N S , A N D P R A C T I C E L E V E L S

3

Public health practice levels
Public health interventions are population-based if they consider all levels of practice. The three inner rings of the
model represent this concept. The inner rings of the model are systems-focused, community-focused, and
individual/family-focused.

A population-based approach considers intervening at all possible levels of practice. Interventions may be directed at
the entire population within a community, the systems that affect the health of those populations, and/or the
individuals and families within those populations known to be at risk.

 Systems-focused population-based practice: Changes organizations, policies, laws, and power structures. The
focus is not directly on individuals and communities but on the systems that impact health. Changing systems
often impacts population health in a more effective and lasting way than requiring change from every individual
in a community.

 Community-focused population-based practice: Changes community norms, attitudes, awareness, practices,
and behaviors. This practice level is directed at entire populations within the community or occasionally toward
target groups within those populations. Community-focused practice is measured in terms of what proportion
of the population actually changes.

 Individual/family-focused population-based practice: Changes knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, practices, and
behaviors of individuals and families. This practice level is directed at individuals, alone or as part of a family,
class, or group. Individuals receive services because they are identified as belonging to a population at risk.

References
Center for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas. (2017). Community Toolbox. Strategies for Community

Change and Improvement: An Overview. Retrieved from https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/promotion-
strategies/overview/main

Ezeonwu, M. C. (2015). Community health nursing advocacy: A concept analysis. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 32(2), 115-128.
doi:10.1080/07370016.2015.1024547

Friedman, A. J., Cosby, R., Boyko, S., Hatton-Bauer, J. & Turnbull, G. (2011). Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for
patient education: A systematic review and practice guideline recommendations. Journal of Cancer Education, 26, 12-21. doi
10.1007/s13187-010-0183-x

Lee, N. R. & Kotler, P. (2016). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Minnesota Department of Health. (2001). Public health interventions: Applications for public health nursing practice.

National Business Coalition on Health. (2008). Community health partnerships tools and information for development and support.
Retrieved from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/42398/Share

World Health Organization. (2018). Public health surveillance. Retrieved
http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/burden/vpd/en/

Minnesota Department of Health Center for Public Health Practice
625 Robert Street N PO Box 64975
St. Paul, MN 55164-0975
651-201-3880 [email protected]
www.health.state.mn.us

July 2019. To obtain this information in a different format, call: 651-201-3880. Printed on recycled paper.

  • Public health interventions (population-based)
  • Public health interventions, defined
  • Public health practice levels
  • References

Capstone nrs493

Create a 10-15 slide Power Point presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. Submit the presentation in the digital classroom for feedback from the instructor.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center

BHA320 Module 2 Case Management of Health Programs

8/31/23, 6:45 PM Case – BHA320 Management of Health Programs (2023AUG14FT-1)

https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/le/content/201244/viewContent/5060127/View 1/2

Module 2 – Case

ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR, STRUCTURE, AND ASSESSMENT

Assignment Overview

Health care management requires leadership skills which will test your ability to make vital decisions.
“Like a rapidly mutating cancer cell, poor leadership within healthcare systems can cause toxic
symptoms that adversely impact organizational work cultures and staff satisfaction and lead to
burnout” (Werberg, 2010, para. 1). Assessments made by leadership have a direct relation to many
areas, including but not limited to the following: The quality of care provided, staff morale, and
organizational reputation. As a trailblazer of your organization, you will use effective leadership skills to
manage/avoid conflict, make effective recommendations, manage staff, and protect the overall
quality/efficiency of the organization. To make effective decisions as a leader you should identify the
major facts, indicate if or what problems exist, and finally, recommend a solution.

This assignment requires you to review a practical case study and analyze the elements of poor
leadership. The case study also explores characteristics of a health care leader while introducing
safety culture. Your assessment and responses to the realistic scenario should be based off leadership
attributes.

Werberg, D. (2010). Transformational leadership and staff retention: An evidence review with
implications for healthcare systems. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 34(3), 246-258. doi:
10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3181e70298

Case Assignment

Read the following case study published by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement:

Griner, P. (2017). Case study: On being transparent. Retrieved from
http://www.ihi.org/education/IHIOpenSchool/resources/Documents/Participant_On%20Being%20Transparent.pdf

After reading the case study, you should complete a 2- to 3-page case analysis that includes three
distinct sections (in addition to your introduction and conclusion):

1. Major Facts – Summarize the facts in the case. This includes the most important incidents in the
case. Avoid simply restating the case.

2. Problem(s) – From the facts it should reveal the problems that need attention. Specify those
problems and explain their significance.

3. Solution and Expected Outcome – Recommend a solution, and for each recommendation provide
an action on how it would be implemented. For each solution provide your expected outcome.

Assignment Expectations

1. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your recommendations
and outcomes. You should have at least two solutions and two outcomes respectively.

2. Limit your response to a maximum of 3 pages.

Listen

8/31/23, 6:45 PM Case – BHA320 Management of Health Programs (2023AUG14FT-1)

https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/le/content/201244/viewContent/5060127/View 2/2

Privacy Policy | Contact

3. Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for
additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals:
http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php

4. You may use Purdue OWL to assist in formatting your assignment:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

nursing

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
  • Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
  • Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
  • Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
  • Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

power points slides

power points slides

Nursing

1.  Analyze the assigned neurological disorder and prepare a report in a two- to three-page document Evaluate the causes of stroke. Discuss the differences between transient ischemic attack and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Discuss the types, warning signals, and treatment of CVA. free from plagiarism. Use correct medical terminology, spelling, and grammar.

Role of the outcomes in evaluating Practice Change

Please see the attachment for the  instructions