assessment 4

Assessment 4

Improvement Plan Tool Kit

For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan, pertaining to medication administration, to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

Introduction

Communication in the health care environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As health care organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote health care wellness at local and global levels. (Kaminski, 2016).

You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

· Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.

· Analyze usefulness of resources for role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements with medication administration.

· Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.

· Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality with medication administration.

·
Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.

· Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on medication administration.

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.

· Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit to be used by its target audience.

· Communicate resource tool kit in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that applies current APA style and formatting.

References

Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices.
 AORN Journal, 102(4), 329–342.

Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors.
 Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11(4), 1–7.

Professional Context-Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an educational or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees' new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use, and resources are available to guide you.

Scenario-For this assessment, consider taking one of these two approaches:

1. Build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to medication administration and put the plan into action.

2. Locate a safety improvement plan (your current organization, the Institution for Healthcare Improvement, or a publicly available safety improvement initiative) pertaining to medication administration and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help an audience understand the research behind the safety improvement plan and how to put the plan into action.

Preparation- Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or GoogleDocs login, or create an account following the directions under the “Create Account” menu.

Refer to the following links to help you get started with Google Sites:

· G Suite Learning Center. (n.d.). 

Get started with Sites
. https://gsuite.google.com/learning-center/products/sites/get-started/#!/

· Google. (n.d.). 

Sites
. https://sites.google.com

· Google. (n.d.). 

Sites help
. https://support.google.com/sites/?hl=en#topic=

Instructions

Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

It is recommended that you focus on the 3 or 4 most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative pertaining to medication administration. For example, for an initiative that concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

Following the recommended scheme, you would collect 3 resources on average for each of the 4 categories focusing on safety with medication administration. Each resource listing should include the following:

· An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.

· A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.

· A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative pertaining to medication administration.

· A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.

Remember that you must make your site ‘public’ so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources for more information.

Here is an example entry:

· Merret, A., Thomas, P., Stephens, A., Moghabghab, R., & Gruneir, M. (2011). 
A collaborative approach to fall prevention. Canadian Nurse, 107(8), 24–29.

· This article presents the Geriatric Emergency Management-Falls Intervention Team (GEM-FIT) project. It shows how a collaborative nurse lead project can be implemented and used to improve collaboration and interdisciplinary teamwork, as well as improve the delivery of health care services. This resource is likely more useful to nurses as a resource for strategies and models for assembling and participating in an interdisciplinary team than for specific fall-prevention strategies. It is suggested that this resource be reviewed prior to creating an interdisciplinary team for a collaborative project in a health care setting.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

· Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to medication administration.

· Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements focusing on medication administration.

· Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk related to medication administration.

· Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.

· Communicate in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that applies current APA style and formatting.

Example Assessment: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with medication administration. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

·
Assessment 4 Example [PDF]
 Download Assessment 4 Example [PDF].

To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

Example Google Site: You may use the example Google Site, 
Resources for Safety and Improvement Measures in Geropsychiatric Care, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like for this assessment but keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with medication administration.

Note: If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

Additional Requirements

· APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style

Scoring Guide

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Improvement Plan Tool Kit Scoring Guide

CRITERIA

NON-PERFORMANCE

BASIC

PROFICIENT

DISTINGUISHED

Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on medication administration.

Analyze usefulness of resources for role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements with medication administration.

Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality with medication administration.

Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.

Communicate resource tool kit in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that applies current APA style and formatting.




W7 Yu

 The use of spirituality in nursing practice is not new.  However, it is more studied and utilized in a more structured format in nursing.  Identify and discuss tools used to evaluate spirituality. 

at least 400 words

Discussion post with proof of no plagiarism

All students are expected to contribute meaningful discussion related to the discussion topic of cultural diversity.  The term “cultural diversity” can also refer to having different cultures respect each other’s differences. Please answer and discuss the following questions.

  • What is culturally sensitive nursing care?
  • How do you assess culture in nursing?
  • How can nurses improve/nurture diversity?

On-line etiquette and respect is expected! Plagiarism will not be tolerated. The student must document the use of sources per APA 7th edition guidelines. See Discussion Rubric under DQ content tab for grading requirements. I have also attached a link with the Rubric directly in the discussion question. 

1 Initial post due: 11/3/23 9:00pm 

  • Initial post 300 word minimum; 2 scholarly reference minimum within 5 yrs

Nursing theory

 Post a brief description of your assigned theory (Disease Causation) and your practice issue. (Diabetes or hypertension) Then, explain how you would apply your assigned theory to your practice issue and explain your reasoning. Be specific and provide examples. Cite your sources in your post. 

Pathophysiology

  

What assessment data would substantiate the diagnosis of menopause?

What type of therapy would you expect this patient to receive? Why?

SOAP note

SOAP note Diabetes mellitus tipe 2

D.Saa Interview #2

INTERVIEW WITH A CULTURALLY DIVERSE CLIENT: Conduct an interview with either a client or a previous healthcare consumer (this may be a neighbor, a volunteer, or a total stranger). Please be mindful of HIPPA and provide for confidentiality. Do not identify the interviewee. • What are the client’s origins? Where were they born? Do they speak another language? (10 Points) • How do they access the healthcare system? What resources are used? (10 Points) • Do they have a primary care physician/nurse practitioner? (10 Points) • Identify any healthcare disparities associated with the client. (10 Points) • Did their socioeconomic status influence their level of or quality of healthcare? (10 Points) • Have they ever experienced any issues during their care while at a healthcare facility? (10 Points) • What specific needs would they like to have addressed when visiting a healthcare practitioner/facility? (10 Points) • Do they require assistance with community resources to improve their level of care? (5 Points)

o If yes, provide a teaching moment and document this in your interview. o If no, provide a listing of resources for future use if needed. Refer to the following link for Monroe County: http://monroe.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/clinical-and-nutrition-services/_documents/community-resource-guide.pdfLinks to an external site.

Week 3 Learning Exercise Analysis: Organizational, Political, and Personal Power/Organizing Patient Care

 

Solve one of the following Learning Exercises from Huston’s Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing, 11th edition.

  • Learning Exercise 13.3 (page 321)
  • Learning Exercise 13.8 (pages 334-335)
  • Learning Exercise 13.10 (page 336)

List which Learning Exercise you are solving at the start of your analysis and provide a brief summary of the case. Be sure to apply an appropriate problem-solving/decision-making model (Traditional Problem-Solving Process, Managerial Decision-Making Model, The Nursing Process, or the Integrated Ethical Problem-Solving Model) in determining what you should do. Justify your decision with supporting evidence

Unit 9 ADHD Medications. 800w. 4 references. Due 10-26-23

Unit 9 ADHD Medications. 800w. 4 references. Due 10-26-23

Thomas Deliver, a 36-year-old male patient, enters your office for his initial appointment.  According to the intake paperwork, Mr. Deliver is a computer programmer who is complaining of problems with concentration, completing tasks, and being terrible at listening during company meetings and even at home.  He explains that he has difficulty starting and completing work projects and trouble being on time or keeping appointments and commitments.  He has divorced 3 months ago and has joint custody of two daughters ages 6 and 10 years old.  On most days, he sleeps late and he has trouble keeping a regular schedule and getting his children to their lessons and extracurricular appointments on time. 

Mr. Deliver believes the lack of concentration and poor communication with his wife led to the divorce, and Mr. Deliver worries that his trouble with organization and attention may affect his custody agreement and prevent him from keeping his job. 

Mr. Deliver’s employer and his family and friends have suggested to him that he should get evaluated for ADHD, but he has resisted because of concerns about the stigma of a psychiatric diagnosis and the risks of taking a psychotropic medication.

Mr. Deliver is 5'11″ and his weight is 165 lb.  He takes a men’s multivitamin daily, HCTZ at 25 mg for hypertension, fish oil 1,000 mg at bedtime for hyperlipidemia, and a rescue inhaler that he keeps with him although he hasn’t had to use it for many years.

1. What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver meets the criteria for ADHD?

2. Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD, inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological treatment for Mr. Deliver?

Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on any medications at this age).  How will your pharmacological treatment change?

Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.

1. What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver

meets the criteria for ADHD?

 The first tool I would use to affirm that this patient meets the criteria for ADHD would be

the DSM-5. The DSM-5 lists the diagnostic criteria for ADHD as needing six or more of

the symptoms in either category 1 (inattention) or category 2 (hyperactivity and

impulsivity) that last for at least 6 months and to a degree that negatively impacts social,

academic or occupations activities. These symptoms also need to be present in two or

more settings, be present prior to age of 12 years and do not occur exclusively during

the course of schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder and are not better explained

by another mental disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). There are also

many screening tools to use in addition to the DSM-5. Rating scales are used in

conjunction with the DSM-5 to help with diagnosis of ADHD. Rating scales specifically

designed for use in adults include: Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Symptom

Assessment Scale for Adults (BADDS); Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS);

ADHD Rating Scale-IV With Adult Prompts (ADHD-RS-IV); and the Adult ADHD SelfReport Scale (ASRS) (Gualtieri & Johnson, 2005).

This study source was downloaded by 100000769192234 from CourseHero.com on 10-21-2023 15:58:26 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/123197904/discussion-9docx/

2. Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD,

inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological

treatment for Mr. Deliver?

I would recommend either an amphetamine or methylphenidate. I am slightly

concerned about this patient’s history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, as both

of these psychostimulant classes have been shown to raise blood pressure. Long

term studies have shown that stimulant use is not associated with increased risk of

heart attacks, cardiac death or stroke. Those with well-controlled hypertension have

been shown to manage ADHD symptoms effectively with amphetamines and

methylphenidates. This still does not negate the fact however, that the product

labels of stimulants state that “caution is indicated” when treating patients with preexisting hypertension (Fairman et al., 2018). I would also be sure to encourage this

patient to partake in behavioral therapy as well as using prescription medication.

3. Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male

that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on

any medications at this age). How will your pharmacological treatment change?

For an adolescent patient the treatment plan is not a lot different than for adults

with ADHD. Stimulants are more effective than non-stimulants, but there can be a

risk for growth restriction. There are other non-stimulant medications that could be

tried first (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, and modafinil). As with

adults with ADHD, I would also recommend concurrent behavioral therapy (Heldt,

2017).

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

(5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing

Fairman, K. A., Davis, L. E., Peckham, A. M., & Sclar, D. A. (2018). Diagnoses of

Cardiovascular Disease or Substance Addiction/Abuse in US Adults Treated for ADHD

with Stimulants or Atomoxetine: Is Use Consistent with Product Labeling? Drugs – Real

World Outcomes, 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0129-2

This study source was downloaded by 100000769192234 from CourseHero.com on 10-21-2023 15:58:26 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/123197904/discussion-9docx/

Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is Objective Diagnosis Possible? Psychiatry

(Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2(11), 44–53.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993524/

Heldt, J. P. (2017). Memorable psychopharmacology. Createspace Independent Publishing

Platform

1.What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that Mr. Deliver meets the criteria for ADHD?

The DSM-5 would be the first resource I would consult to confirm if this patient satisfies the requirements for ADHD. According to the DSM-5, six or more symptoms from either group—category 1 (inattention) or category 2 (hyperactivity and impulsivity)—must be present for at least six months and have a detrimental influence on a person's ability to engage in social, academic, or occupational activities. Additionally, these symptoms must appear in two or more contexts, appear before the age of twelve, not only occasionally during the course of schizophrenia or another psychotic condition, and not be better explained by another mental illness (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).The DSM-5 is just one of several screening instruments available. The DSM-5 and rating scales are combined to assist in the diagnosis of ADHD. The Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale for Adults (BADDS), the Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale (ACDS), the ADHD Rating Scale-IV With Adult Prompts (ADHD-RS-IV), and the Adult ADHD SelfReport Scale (ASRS) are among the rating scales created expressly for use in adults (Gualtieri & Johnson, 2005).

 

 

2.Further assessment determines that Mr. Deliver does meet the criteria for ADHD, inattentive type. What is the current recommendation for pharmacological treatment for Mr. Deliver?

 

Either an amphetamine or methylphenidate is what I would advise. The patient's history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia causes me a little anxiety because it has been demonstrated that both of these kinds of psychostimulants can increase blood pressure. Studies conducted over an extended period of time have revealed no link between stimulant usage and an increased risk of heart attacks, cardiac death, or stroke. Amphetamines and methylphenidate have been demonstrated to help people with well-controlled hypertension manage their ADHD symptoms. However, this does not change the fact that while treating patients with preexisting hypertension, caution is advised on the product labels of stimulants (Fairman et al., 2018). In addition to prescription medication, I would make sure to encourage this patient to engage in behavioral treatment.

 

3.Assume that instead of Mr. Deliver being 36-years-old, Thomas is a 13-year-old male that also meets the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, hyperactive type (Thomas is not on any medications at this age). How will your pharmacological treatment change?

The treatment strategy is mostly the same for adolescents and adults with ADHD. Although stimulants are more effective than non-stimulants, there is a chance that they may limit growth. There are more non-stimulant drugs that might be tried initially (atomoxetine, guanfacine, clonidine, bupropion, and modafinil). In the same way that I would advise concurrent behavioral therapy for people with ADHD (Heldt, 2017)

Step-by-step explanation

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing

 

 Fairman, K. A., Davis, L. E., Peckham, A. M., & Sclar, D. A. (2018). Diagnoses of Cardiovascular Disease or Substance Addiction/Abuse in US Adults Treated for ADHD with Stimulants or Atomoxetine: Is Use Consistent with Product Labeling? Drugs – Real World Outcomes, 5(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-017-0129-2

 

Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is Objective Diagnosis Possible? Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)), 2(11), 44-53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993524/ 

 

Heldt, J. P. (2017). Memorable psychopharmacology. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.