SOAP note rc

SOAP note renal colic

Reply Microscopy

I find the use of microscopes fascinating. It still blows my mind that before the microscope was invented looking at cells and all their components was never a thing! The use of the microscope opened so many doors in medicine, it really is incredible. A specific scenario where I would require the use of a microscope would be if I were wanting to identify certain toxins that may be responsible for causing autoimmune diseases such as Lupus. The type of light microscope that is needed in this scenario uses fluorescent-labeled antibodies to detect certain bacteria, viruses, or toxins. It uses specific staining techniques to identify distribution of proteins or other molecules. Fluorescent microscopes were first invented in between 1911 and 1913 by two German physicists Heimstaedt and Lehmann.

The second microscope I would use is a confocal microscope. A confocal microscope offers high-quality images that are relatively easy to obtain from specimens, which makes it one of the more popular microscopes. However, this specific type of microscope can increase cell and tissue death due to the high- intensity laser. This may cause people to opt out of using the Confocal microscope if they are dealing with certain tissues or cells that are more sensitive. 

References:

Caprette, D. (2013). Medical Lab. Up Close: A look at Clinical Microscopy. 

          https://www.medlabmag.com/article/1122#:~:text=The%20light%20microscope%20is%20perhaps,used%20tool%20in%20the%20laboratoryF  e

Fellters, T, Davidson, M. (nd). Evident. Confocal Microscopy. https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-Links to an external site.

    resource/primer/techniques/confocal/confocalintro/

question

Original work, no plagiarism, Cite, Reference 3-4 paragraphs.

Below is a list of research studies, including the targeted sample population to be included in the study.  Select 
ONE of these studies/populations and discuss how you might apply tools of the principles of human subjects research (autonomy, justice, beneficence). Review the 

slides
 and/or these resources (
University of Virginia
Links to an external site.
 ; 
University of Northern Iowa
Links to an external site.
) to identify specific considerations for your population and study. Consider a specific focus on issues around 1) risk and protections from risk for the specific population, 2) informed consent and how this will be acquired, and 3) additional concerns and protections based on the population or study.  I am not looking for expertise in the research topic but how well you address the human subjects principles for a specific population.

1) Efficacy study of an exercise enrichment program for nursing facilities in reducing fall-related injuries among elderly residents

2) Folic acid supplementation for pregnant women to improve neonatal health outcomes

3) Motivational interviewing and peer counseling to reduce recidivism after incarceration among inmates in federal prison

4) Mixed methods approach to nutritional characterization among parents of young children in low-income households

5) Behavioral interventions to improve asthma-related health outcomes among youth aged 5-12

Research Critique on Impact of Nursing diversity

write a critique of a research article. (example will be provided) 

research article will be provided in pdf format. 

  research topic is “The Impact of Nursing Diversity in Patient Care on the Medical-Surgical Floor”

Please review previous work done and follow the rubric carefully and write each answer in different paragraphs with titles; 

Rubric;

1.      Is the research study relevant to the study of nursing, (be specific   and include examples from the article)? 

2.  Is the method/design appropriate in terms of the research question/hypothesis? What was the research question/hypothesis? Was it clearly stated? Refer back to Polit & Beck (2021) (The Method Section). Key elements are discussed, and identification of items should be included. Provide a description of each of these key elements.  

3.   What is the theoretical context? See chapter 7 in Polit & Beck. The terms theoretical and conceptual frameworks are used interchangeably. Theories are used to describe, predict, explain, and to control phenomena.   (Theoria is a Greek Word that means beholding or speculation). 

“Theoretical frameworks provide the organization for the study. It guides the researcher in the interpretations of the results. the importance of the theory is dependent on the degree of research based evidence and level of its theory development. There are four levels of theory development 1) factor isolating (describe phenomena) 2) Factor relating (explain phenomena), 3) Situation relating (predict 

the relationships between/among phenomena), 4) Situation producing (control phenomena and relationships

**If your article does not have a theoretical framework what do you suggest based on Polit & Beck Chapter 7?  

4.  Describe the results of the study (identify if they are believable or not)  

5.  Are the results significant? In what way-explain use examples?  

6.   Are the results transferable? How? Transferability refers to the readers of the research to make connections but invites readers of research to make connections between elements of a study and their own experience. Transferability does not involve broad claims. How does this research apply to YOUR specific practice as a Registered Nurse?  

According to Brown (2005), Transferability can be enhanced by providing what is often referred to as thick description (i.e., giving enough detail so the readers can decide for themselves if the results

are transferable to their own contexts).   

7.  Implications for nursing practice, be specific how would this study impact nursing practice (use specific examples from the article)?  

8.  Implications for future research, be specific and use examples from the article.  

9.  The paper shall reflect a scholarly effort; proper grammar, coherence, spelling, and accurately use APA format. Have someone proof read your paper. Read your paper out loud to yourself.  

Also check all the attachments. 

week 2 reply

Professor and class,

I have been lucky enough to work with three different EHR systems between clinical and my current job in the ED. I have been able to compare and contrast the pros and the cons between the EHRs’ and their health information systems. Upon starting in my ED a year and a half ago I was originally oriented to the EHR called Cerner. I really enjoyed this EHR as I felt that the HIS worked well at providing safe and efficient patient care. The allergies and current patient medications came up as a “to-do” flag within each patient upon admission. This ensured that the nurse was able to check off what the patient may have already taken that day, or what they may be allergic to before giving a patient a medication. After entering the patients history it was then documented in a place that was easy for the doctors and pharmacy to locate in order to enter and verify medications. This allowed for three different healthcare professionals to verify that this patient would be getting a medication that was safe for them. I now work with the EHR “Epic.” Although I like EPIC a lot, I feel that there are some flaws with it’s HIS system. I did some research, and found a study on the effectiveness of healthcare information systems throughout the city of Neyshabur in 2019. “Despite great effort to develop and utilize HISs and improve their effectiveness in improving patient care, the present study indicated an index of 64.42 out of 100 and reflected that there was still a gap to complete effectiveness” (Mohammadpour et al., 2021). They found many gaps in the staffs’ understanding on how to gather and implement data in order to form safe and efficient interventions for each patient. I find that, with EPIC, it is easier to be quickly inputting data within the ED and forget to acknowledge the patients prior history and allergies as the system does not prompt you to do so (at least with the version of EPIC that we have). With that being said, it is easier for medication errors to happen. I also feel that EPIC does not communicate with the PYXIS (medication administration station) as well as it could. With Cerner it would not let you scan a medication in to give it to a patient if it was not physically ordered within the chart. In Epic it will let the nurse scan any medication into the chart, and will open the medication up under a “non-ordered” medication admin panel. If not paying attention, this could make for a huge medication error in the ED as we mainly pull potentially dangerous medications on override when in emergent situations. Lastly, with Epic patients now have 24/7 access to their health chart. They can view and screenshot their labs, meds, appointments etc. This is exciting for the patient as they are able to easily access appointment changes, and medication requests through all of their HCP. “Astute nurses need to be familiar with these advantages and disadvantages so that they can advise patients correctly” (Chamberlain College of Nursing, 2020). The nurse should be able to properly advise the patient on how to interpret their laboratory values. It is important for the patients to be educated on the need to speak with the HCP after getting new laboratory results before coming to their own conclusions. A struggle that I have seen through my ED is that we will be very busy and start what we call protocols in the waiting room. This is where the nurse draws the patients blood without them being sent to a room yet in order to speed up their care. This ensures we see the sickest patients as soon as possible. The patients will then get these results back while in the waiting room, and google them. This allows some patients extreme health anxiety while in the waiting room, and on the other hand will result in patients leaving without treatment as they feel whatever results they got back were “good enough to go home.” These three things have made the transition from Cerner to Epic negative for me, but I feel as though my nursing supervisor actively works on any complaints that we have regarding the transition we are having as a hospital. Epic has a lot of different versions and updates and through our feedback we are working out all of the “kinks”.  This makes the transition into a new EHR less scary, and more positive, as I always think back to how much technology has the potential to upgrade as we identify areas in need of change. I feel that technology is very important in healthcare as it allows for quick and “easy” access to patient records, but there will always be room for improvements which means that nurses need to be that more cognizant of the potential of errors.

Resources 

Mohammadpour, A., Ghaemi, M. M., Darrudi, R., & Sadagheyani, H. E. (2021). Use of Hospital Information System to Improve the Quality of Health Care from Clinical Staff Perspective. 
Galen medical journal. DOI: 

10.31661/gmj.v10i0.1830

Chamberlain College of Nursing (2020). 
NR361 Information Systems in Healthcare: Downers Grove, IL: Online Publication. 

PRESCRIBING FOR OLDER ADULTS AND PREGNANT WOMEN

TO PREPARE:

· Choose
one of the two following specific populations: either
pregnant women or
older adults. Then, select a specific disorder from the 
DSM-5-TR to use.

· Use the Walden Library to
research evidence-based treatments for your selected disorder in your selected population (either older adults or pregnant women). You will need to recommend one FDA-approved drug, one non-FDA-approved “off-label” drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating the disorder in that population.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 9

· Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your chosen disorder in older adults or pregnant women.

· Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision  making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?

· Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder, and if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.

· Support your reasoning with at least three current, credible scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a nonpharmacological intervention for the disorder

Intro to nursing reaearch

 Define evidence-based practice. Describe the difference between a nursing practice problem and a medical practice problem. Provide one example of each. Discuss why is it important to ensure your PICOT is based on a nursing practice problem. 

customers d2

Discuss the needs of potential customers who could benefit from your nursing expertise. What are some of the known attributes of successful entrepreneurs?

Expectations

Initial Post:

  • Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
  • Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

Scholarly – Hypertension in Homeless

PLease follow the “SCHOLARLY INSTRUCTIONS” for the instructions about it and build on all the other attachments for it

questions

Original Work, No Plagiarism, Cite and Reference

You (a research assistant) are administering an electronic survey about chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy to Edith, a participant receiving chemotherapy, in the infusion suite. The survey is administered using software on a iPad. You hand Edith the iPad and while she is clicking around to answer the survey, she accidentally navigates to the main page of the survey administration software, revealing the first and last names of everyone on the study. This is not the first time that a data privacy incident has occurred during the conduct of this study.

Discussion Questions

1. What security steps could you take in the future to prevent participants from navigating to the home page of the survey administration software when they complete the survey on the iPad? 

2. If you were the PI of this study, how would you explain to your research assistant the importance of data privacy/security?

3. If you were the PI of this study, should you report this incident to the IRB? Why or why not? 

4. In an alternate scenario, when you approach Edith to administer the survey, Edith says that she does not remember being apart of a research study. How would you respond in this situation? Should you still administer the survey?