WK7A

/in /by

Be sure to provide 5 APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.

Please be sure to follow EACH AND EVERY BULLET POINT.

Make sure to ANSWER EACH QUESTION ACCURATELY.

(TOPIC: In Attachment**)

***Please be sure to include all information from the attachment in the assignment*****

Please use template attached to complete assignment.

*****PLEASE VIEW VIDEO, FOLLOW GUIDELINES ATTACHED AND CRITIQUE ATTACHED *********

USE TEMPLATE ATTACHED*****

W1 NT OP

/in /by

 Presentation 1 page (blank I will put my data), task 1 page (with the topics), reference 1 page, (3 pages). for the Sunday Homework:

 Homework on the indicated topics. APA 7. Reference less than 3 years Plagiarism is analyzed and it is critical, the activity is invalidated. 

Issue

 1. Arguments in favor of the development and continued use of the great theories of nursing 

2. Arguments in favor of the obsolescence of the great theories of nursing 

Stratified Sampling, Cluster Sampling, Random Sampling, and Systematic Sampling

/in /by

Review the terms Stratified Sampling, Cluster Sampling, Random Sampling, and Systematic Sampling from “The Visual Learner: Statistics,” located in the Topic 2 Resources.

For this question you are divided into groups based on your last name. Identify your given sampling method using the first letter of your last name.

  • A-F – Stratified Sampling
  • G-L – Cluster Sampling
  • M-R – Random Sampling
  • S-Z – Systematic Sampling

Use the assigned sampling method to answer the following question:

Imagine that you are conducting a patient satisfaction survey at your health care facility. How would the assigned sampling method be applied in this case? What are the strengths and weakness of the assigned sampling method in this scenario?

Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “HLT-362V Discussion Question Rubric” and “HLT-362V Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

ED

/in /by

 Your patient is a 42-year-old female that arrives in the ED with complaints of fever and not feeling well. She is currently undergoing chemotherapy for bladder cancer. She has an indwelling urinary catheter with scant amount of dark, foul smelling urine. She has a temperature of 102.2F, HR 136, BP 110/50 and RR 28. She is allergic to penicillin and Sulfa.

  • What type of shock is she experiencing?
  • What interventions do you anticipate the doctor will order?
  • What can you teach this patient about prevention of infection?
  • The doctor orders Bactrim. What should you be concern about? Why?

At least one full page and reference 

Nutritional Principles in Nursing

/in /by

NU117/NUR1172 Section 03 Nutritional Principles in Nursing (11 Weeks) – Online Plus – 2023 Fall Quarter

Module 01 Discussion – Dietary Likes and Dislikes Awareness

Discussion Topic

Activity Time:

2 hours

Directions:

Our nutrition and eating patterns are shaped by our perceptions of food; what we have learned to like and dislike, what we feel is healthful, and it is even formed by our family, cultural, and religious beliefs.

For this discussion, list five foods/liquids you like and five foods/liquids you don't like and/or avoid. For each you like, describe why you like them. For example, you might say I like to eat chocolate chip cookies because they remind me of my grandmother.

For the five you do not like to eat/avoid, explain why. For example, you might say I don't eat lima beans because they taste too mushy in my mouth or I don't drink milk because I am lactose intolerant, or I don't eat beef because of religious beliefs.

In addition to explaining why you don't like the five foods/liquids, also include what it would take (if possible) for you to overcome your dislike of the food/liquid.

Please make an initial post by midweek, and respond to at least two other student's posts with substantial details that demonstrate an understanding of the concepts and critical thinking. Remember that your posts must exhibit appropriate writing mechanics including using proper language, cordiality, and proper grammar and punctuation. If you refer to any outside sources or reference materials, be sure to provide proper attribution and/or citation.

Nursing Assignment

/in /by

WEEK 5

This paper will have three parts addressing two important pieces of legislation related to the right of individuals to make health care decisions for themselves.

Part I

The Advance Health Care Directive 

Locate a copy of an advanced directive (AD) that complies with the laws of the state in which you work. The organization in which you work should have a copy of an advance directive that is given to patients. If not, download your state's Advance Directives here 

http://www.caringinfo.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3289.Links to an external site.

Complete the advance directive for yourself.  
Do not turn in your AD with your paper. The AD is for your personal use.

In your paper, Part I:

1. Identify where you obtained the AD and explain its compliance with state law.

2. Conduct research (1-2 sources) to learn more about the AD in your state and explain how it works.   

3. Discuss how easy or difficult it was to complete the AD. Your comments should be specific and both objective and
 subjective. For example, when you state your personal feelings, you must relate them to the literature (textbook and research) that discusses this process and the difficulties that many people face when completing an advance directive.

(Cite/ reference any sources you use to explore these questions, including your texts.)

Part II

Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form

1. What is a 

Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) formLinks to an external site.
?

POLST: Portable medical orders for seriously ill or frail individuals

2. When should this form be completed?

3. Who can complete the form?

4. Who needs to sign the form to make it a legal document?

(Cite/reference any sources you use to explore these questions, including your texts.)

Part III

Tie the two first sections together by writing a summary and conclusion.

This section should address:

1. the differences between an Advance Health Care Directive and the POLST,

2. the RN's important role in assuring the patient's right to autonomy in choosing the healthcare interventions the patient does or does not want.

____________________________________________

Use current APA Style.

The paper should be between 3-5 pages in length excluding the title and reference page(s). 

Cite and reference the course text and at least two (2) additional appropriate professional sources.   

NURS_521_DE – Feild Activity Paper

NURS_521_DE – Feild Activity Paper

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

50 to >43.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Content is clear, thorough, and organized effectively. Main points are well supported. Meets all of the criteria of the written assignment.

43.5 to >37.5 pts

Approaches Expectations

Content is somewhat clear, thorough, and organized effectively. Some points are well supported. Meets most of the criteria of the written assignment.

37.5 to >29.5 pts

Below Expectations

Content is generally unclear, not thorough, and organized ineffectively. Main points are not well supported. Meets only a few of the criteria of the written assignment.

29.5 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Content is disconnected, unorganized, and does not meet the criteria of the written assignment.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Coherence

50 to >43.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Writing flows smoothly from one idea to another. Writer has taken pains to assist the reader in following the logic of the ideas expressed.

43.5 to >37.5 pts

Approaches Expectations

Sentences are mostly structured to communicate ideas clearly. Transitions between paragraphs make the writer’s points easy to follow.

37.5 to >29.5 pts

Below Expectations

Sentence structure and word choice sometimes interfere with clarity of content and distract the reader.

29.5 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Poor sentence structure, sentences do not make sense; no clarity evident in the paper.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Citations Within the Body of the Paper

12.5 to >10.88 pts

Meets Expectations

The required number of scholarly references is used and cited skillfully throughout the paper.

10.88 to >9.38 pts

Approaches Expectations

The required number of scholarly references is used but some may not be cited accurately or skillfully throughout the paper.

9.38 to >7.38 pts

Below Expectations

The required number of scholarly references is not used and most are not cited accurately or skillfully throughout the paper.

7.38 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

References or citations are not included in the body of the paper and writing indicates none were used.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA

12.5 to >10.88 pts

Meets Expectations

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

10.88 to >9.38 pts

Approaches Expectations

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

9.38 to >7.38 pts

Below Expectations

The assignment generally follows current APA format with several mistakes and grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced incorrectly.

7.38 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Sources are missing.

12.5 pts

Total Points: 125

nursing

/in /by

 How often do you engage with or witness death in your work? How has this experience or the lack of it shaped your view of death? Has it gotten easier or harder for you to accept the fact of death? As you explain, include your clinical specialty. 

PMHNP

/in /by

Research the 3 highest priority Differential Diagnoses, the proposed interventions with rationale and respond to the case.  

Week 4 Discussion

/in /by

HUM 1050 – Introduction to Literature

Unit 4 Discussion (9/25-10/1) Evaluating Film

For this discussion, you should view the film 
Away from her (Egoyan et al., 2006). This week we will use the Munro short story “The bear came over the mountain? (2013) as the criteria against which to evaluate the film 
Away from her (Egoyan et al., 2006). You will be making a judgment based on the evidence from the story and the film to evaluate how well the film depicts the story and how well the story and the film depict Alzheimer's. 

· Do you think the film accurately depicts the characters in the short story?

· Do you think that the film justifies the themes of the story?

· Does the film accurately depict Alzheimer's?

· Does the film present as overly sentimental?

· Do you prefer the film or the short story? 

You should DO THREE SEPARATE POSTS ON THIS CONTENT ACTIVITY

References

Egoyan, A. Hirst, V., Iron, D. Mankoff, D. Urdl, S. Weiss, J. (Producers), & Polley, S. (Director). (2006).

Away from her. [Motion picture]. Canada: Foundry Film

Munro, A. (2013, Oct 21). The bear came over the mountain. 
The New Yorker.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/10/21/the-bear-came-over-the-mountain-2

All citations from the film should be: (Egoyan et al., 2006).

Add timestamp number to citations with direct quotes from the film.

Add a para. number to citations with direct quotes from the story.