W1 see attachment

/in /by


NR599-11532

Week 1

Preparing the Discussion  Introductions

1. Post a written response in the forum to 
EACH question. Each response should be 
substantive and provide enough 
detail to answer the question 
comprehensively. This assignment 
DOES NOT require citation or references. 

2. During what month were you born? 

3. What does informatics mean to you? Provide 
one detailed 
example. 

4. What specifically about informatics do you want to learn in this course? 

5. Select 
one personal photograph which has significant meaning to you. Attach the photograph in JPEG or PDF format to the discussion forum AND provide a caption. The following hyperlink includes instructions for uploading an image: 

https://community.canvaslms.com/docs/DOC-10700-4212190965Links to an external site.

Psychopathology

/in /by

Thinking about what you’ve learned in this course about 

1-    If you had the power to change anything in this class that is assessment related, what would you change and why?

2-    How will the concepts you learned in this class help you in your career? 

The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor. 

The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday day and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board in a respectful manner. 

Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. 

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

Rigor, currency,  and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%

Shadow Health Digital Clinical Experience Health History Documentation

/in /by

 Rubric for grading

subjective Documentation in Provider Note Template: Subjective narrative documentation in Provider Note Template is detailed and organized and includes: Chief Complaint (CC), HPI, Current Medications, Allergies, Past Medical History, Family History, Social History and Review of Systems (ROS)ROS: covers all body systems that may help you formulate a list of differential diagnoses. You should list each system as follows: General: Head: EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe. 

Capstone PowerPoint Poster Presentation

/in /by

– Present a revised Capstone from the one (ATTACHED).

-Use the template I have provided for you. ( ATTACHED)

– DUE DATE OCTOBER 16, 2023 NO LATER THIS IS THE LAST DAY OF THIS CLASS, CANT BE LATE

-NO PLAGIARISM MORE TAN 10 %

Unit 2 Weekly Clinical Communication and Documentation Requirements. 500w due 11-11-23

/in /by

Unit 2 Weekly Clinical Communication and Documentation Requirements. 500w due 11-11-23

Instructions

Complete and submit the below Weekly Clinical Communication form.

A screenshot of a white sheet Description automatically generated

image1.png

active and latent errors

/in /by

Identify examples of active and latent errors. Provide examples from your clinical experience, if possible. How can such errors be avoided to support better patient care?

pn 2 m1 written

/in /by

 Submit your completed assignment by following the directions

600 w6 p1

/in /by

What are the benefits of evaluating the role of outcomes in practice change through research? Discuss how you would evaluate the roles of outcomes through a change proposed from research findings.

Expectations

Initial Post:

keep all posts you win on bids in US sources

  • Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
  • Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

Peer Responses:

discussion

/in /by

Post a description of the focus of your scenario. Describe the data that could be used and how the data might be collected and accessed. What knowledge might be derived from that data? How would a nurse leader use clinical reasoning and judgment in the formation of knowledge from this experience?

BY DAY 6 O

REQUIRED READING

· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). 
Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 1, “Nursing Science and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 7–17)

· Chapter 2, “Introduction to Information, Information Science, and Information Systems” (pp. 21–32)

· Chapter 3, “Computer Science and the Foundation of Knowledge Model” (pp. 35–64)