OFF-LABEL DRUG USE IN PEDIATRICS

 

 This week we have an assignment regarding the neurologic and musculoskeletal system.  Please use the following interactive media case for your paper: 

https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6521/05/mm/decision_trees/week_10/index.html

 

DECISION TREE FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS

 For your Assignment, your Instructor will assign you one of the decision tree interactive media pieces provided in the Resources. As you examine the patient case studies in this module’s Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting symptoms of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. 

To Prepare:

  • Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor. 
  • Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.
  • Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.
  • You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.

 

Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:

  • Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
  • Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
  • What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
  • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.

theory of Self-Efficacy

Using the criteria presented in week 2, critique the theory of Self-Efficacy using the internal and external criticism evaluation process.

This is the criteria presented in week 2 “Making judgement as to whether a theory could be adapted for use in research is very important.  Describe the internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate middle range theories.” I have attached work from week 2 as reference 

Require 400 words and at least 3 scholarly references no later than 5 years old. 

No Plagiarism

Topic Selection: COVID-19

 

Global Health infographic Assignment Guidelines and Rubric

 Purpose

  • This assignment aims to enhance your understanding of key global health issues and competencies by creating an informative and visually appealing infographic.

Topic Selection

  • Choose a Global Health Issue: Select a specific global health issue that aligns with the global health determinants. Ensure the issue is complex and multifaceted.

Research and Data Gathering

  • In-Depth Research: Conduct comprehensive research on your chosen global health issue. Gather data, evidence-based information, and epidemiological trends from reputable sources.

Infographic Creation

  • Organize your infographic into the following sections, aligning with the competencies:
    • Analyzing and Prioritizing Global Health Issues
      • Issue Highlight: Provide a concise title or introduction for your chosen global health issue.
      • Data and Trends: Present data, statistics, and trends related to the issue from diverse and credible sources.
      • Rationale: Explain why this issue is a significant health challenge in various populations and regions, considering social, economic, and environmental factors.
    • Evaluating Socioeconomic Impact
      • Visual Representation: Use graphics, charts, or diagrams to illustrate how socioeconomic factors influence health outcomes.
      • Relationship Visualization: Create visual elements that show the interplay between poverty, education, access to healthcare, and disease prevalence.
      • Brief Strategies: Offer brief insights or strategies to address health disparities related to socioeconomic factors.
    • Examining Ethical Implications
      • Ethical Context: Include a dedicated section highlighting the ethical dimensions of your chosen global health issue.
      • Specific Issues: Identify and visually represent specific ethical dilemmas or human rights violations associated with the issue.
      • Ethical Solutions: Suggest interventions or ethical approaches to protect vulnerable populations and ensure ethical healthcare practices.
    • Culturally Sensitive Health Promotion
      • Cultural Sensitivity: Emphasize the importance of cultural sensitivity in health promotion.
      • Cultural Impact: Provide examples or visuals depicting how cultural diversity impacts health outcomes.
      • Age-Appropriate Interventions: Suggest culturally sensitive interventions for different age groups, with a focus on preventive care.
    • Interprofessional Collaboration
      • Visualize Collaboration: Create visuals that represent the concept of interprofessional collaboration in the context of global health.
      • Communication and Coordination: Include elements that emphasize effective communication, coordination, and teamwork among diverse healthcare professionals and stakeholders.
      • Benefits of Diversity: Highlight the benefits of integrating diverse perspectives and expertise in addressing global health challenges.

APA Guidelines

  • Title of the Infographic Assignment
  • Your Name
  • Institutional Affiliation
  • Date
  • In-Text Citations
    • If you use information or data from sources within your infographic, provide in-text citations. Use author-date format. For example: (Smith, 2022) or (World Health Organization, 2020).
  • References List
    • If you refer to sources within your infographic, include a separate reference list. Format it according to APA style. Each source cited in your infographic should have a corresponding full citation in the reference list.
    • Use minimally 3 peer reviewed sources, written within the last 5 years.
  • Fonts and Formatting
    • Ensure your infographic is legible by using a clear and consistent font style and size.
  • Figures and Images
    • If your infographic includes figures, charts, or images from external sources, cite them in the figure caption, and include the full citation in your reference list.
  • Submission Format
    • PowerPoint, PDF, PNG or JPEG

Capstone

What areas related to test-taking do you feel need improvement? What strategies could you utilize to improve your own test-taking skills? List a minimum of five strategies you have identified that will assist in your successful outcome.

Your initial response to the post should be 400 words in length and include proper APA formatting when referencing your resources.

RESPONSE TO DISCUSSION BOARD 3

INSTRUCTIONS TO HOMEWORK

Please see attached document. Response to the question should have depth and include enriching posts with applicable nursing implication(practice, education, research, or advocacy), current events, personal thoughts. Please provide in text scientific citations.

Nursing

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines


Purpose

The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health topic.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

(CO 4) Utilize critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making and implementation of the nursing process for psychiatric/mental health clients. (PO 4)

(CO 5) Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO 5)

(CO 7) Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making. (PO 6)

(CO 9) Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO 8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points


Preparing the assignment

1) Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

a. Select a scholarly nursing or research article, published within the last five years, related to mental health nursing. The content of the article must relate to evidence-based practice.

· You may need to evaluate several articles to find one that is appropriate.

b. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article, then submit your choice for faculty approval.

c. The submitted assignment should be 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages.

2) Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric must match exactly).

a. Introduction (10 points/10%)

· Establishes purpose of the paper

· Captures attention of the reader

b. Article Summary (30 points/30%)

· Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care

· Key points of the article

· Key evidence presented

· Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice

c. Article Critique (30 points/30%)

· Present strengths of the article

· Present weaknesses of the article

· Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague

d. Conclusion (15 points/15%)

· Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text

· Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper

· Is clearly written

e. Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)

· Current (published in last 5 years)

· Relevant to mental health care

· Not used by another student within the clinical group

· Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

f. APA format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_MAY21 2

· Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure

· No spelling or typographical errors

· Document includes title and reference pages

· Citations in the text and reference page

For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the
APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.



Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance

High Level of Performance

Satisfactory Level of Performance

Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

Section not present in paper

Introduction

(10 points/10%)

10 points

8 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Establishes purpose of the paper

2. Captures attention of the reader

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Article Summary

(30 points/30%)

30 points

25 points

24 points

11 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care

2. Key points of the article

3. Key evidence presented

4. Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice

Includes 4 requirements for section.

Includes 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Article Critique

(30 points/30%)

30 points

25 points

11 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Present strengths of the article

2. Present weaknesses of the article

3. Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague

Includes 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Conclusion

(15 points/15%)

15 points

11 points

6 points

0 points

1. Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text

2. Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper

3. Is clearly written

Includes 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Article Selection and Approval

(5 points/5%)

5 points

4 points

3 points

2 points

0 points

1. Current (published in last 5 years)

2. Relevant to mental health care

Includes 4

Includes 3

Includes 2

Includes 1

No requirements for

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

NR326_RUA_Scholarly_Article_Review_V4b_FINAL_MAY21 4

3. Not used by another student within the clinical group

4. Submitted and approved as directed by instructor

requirements for section.

requirements for section.

requirements for section.

requirement for section.

this section presented.

APA Format and Writing Mechanics

(10 points/10%)

10 points

8 points

7 points

4 points

0 points

1. Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure

2. No spelling or typographical errors

3. Document includes title and reference pages

4. Citations in the text and reference page

Includes 4 requirements for section.

Includes 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Total Points Possible = 100 points

image1.png

fundamentals M 4

Module 04 Written Assignment Nursing Process – Case Study

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Module 04 Content

1.

Top of Form

Please read the following case study and complete the questions below.

Daniel is a 16 year old boy who is an identical twin. He and his brother Jeff are very close and do most things together. While Daniel excels at sports he believe his brother is much better at most everything. Daniel, his brother, and their two sisters live with their parents in the Midwest. Recently Daniel has been feeling more tired than usual. He thought it was because of his schedule and school work, which he is fairly good at. He gets mostly Bs, but his grades have been slipping of late. One day he fainted while getting ready for a game. His coach called his parents to let them know Daniel was taken to the Emergency Room. While there the doctor decided to admit Daniel to the hospital for observation. At the time he was running a slight fever, his breathing was shallow, and he was sweating. He was also very sleepy and his blood pressure was high. He did have some abnormal laboratory work, but his doctor was not too concerned at present. Daniel also stated that he felt achy.

You are assigned to take care of Daniel today and when you walk into his room, his mother and brother Jeff are there. Daniel appears to be sleeping. In your written assignment, respond to the following questions applying the nursing process:

Assessment: What type of objective and subjective data can you collect with what you know? How will you collect these data? What further evidence do you need?

Analysis and Identification of the Problem: What do you believe Daniel's problem(s) are? What might be the nursing diagnoses? Use the following for identification.

Planning: Identify two goals and one nursing intervention for each, based on your nursing diagnoses.

While you will not be able to 
implement or 
evaluate, how well do you think your nursing interventions might help with Daniel's care.

Additional Resource


Nurse’s Pocket Guide: Diagnoses, Prioritized Interventions, and Rationales

help

Critique a Aanp organization

Write a 2 page critique of this meeting using APA format for any cited resources and create a document that describes: 

  1. The Organization
  2. Mission, goals, and focus
  3. Membership

Replies-Mreen

I have to write a reply to each of the texts in the document attached below, they must be 200 words each and include references.

week 1

Discussion Social Factors (Graded)

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to identify community data that impacts social factors of health.

Preparing the Assignment

· Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

· Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

· Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

· Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

· Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

· Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

· Best Practices include:

· Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

· Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

· Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

There are many factors that make people healthy or ill.  This week we will focus on the social factors and determinants that impact health.

It is time to get out into your community!

· Go online to the U.S. Census Bureau at 

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ Links to an external site.
(*note, you will be using this website in the Week 2 assignment, so you can get started on collecting all the required data if desired)

· Input your local zip code, city, or county. Try to get as specific data as possible (city, township, county).

· Next, identify the:

· Total population

· Median income

· Percentage or number of persons living in poverty

· Go to your local grocery store, use a flyer, or app. Include the stores name, city, and state. Identify cost for the following items (please note whether items are organic):

· 1 gallon of milk

· 1 loaf of bread

· 1 bag of apples (include price per pound)

· 1 bag of carrots

· 1 large container of yogurt

· 1 2-liter of soda

· 1 bag of chips

· 1 package of cookies

· Utilizing the data collected, discuss social factors that might impact what groceries are purchased. Try to be as specific to your community as possible (location, availability, poverty levels, etc.).

· Discuss how a community health nurse (CHN) could use one of the 17 intervention categories from the Public Health Intervention Wheel to address areas of food security (Nies & McEwen, 2019).

· In your responses to classmates, include comparisons and contrasting information.

Your discussion post should look like:

· Paragraph one: Utilizing the data collected, discuss a social factor that might impact what groceries are purchased. Try to be as specific to your community as possible (location, availability, poverty levels, etc.)

· Paragraph two: Utilizing the data collected, discuss 
another social factor that might impact what groceries are purchased. Try to be as specific to your community as possible (location, availability, poverty levels, etc.)

· Paragraph three: Discuss how a community health nurse (CHN) could use one of the 17 intervention categories from the Public Health Intervention Wheel to address areas of food security

· Resources: Where did you find your data?

EBOOK used: Community/Public Health Nursing
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9780323528948/epubcfi/6/2%5B%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dhtml-cover-page%5D!/4/2/4%4050:79

OR

Email:
[email protected]

PWD: Bryanthierry@09