Human resource

/in /by

NEED ASAP

COMPLETE TWO ASSESSMENTS—CHOOSE TWO FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST.

  • Daft, R. L. (2018). The leadership experience (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage. 
    • Chapter 6, “Courage and Moral Leadership.” 
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.1: Ethical Maturity, page 172.
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.2: Your Servant Leadership Orientation, page 180.
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.3: Assess Your Moral Courage, page 184  
  • Your leadership assessments this week focus on ethical maturity, servant leadership, and moral courage. Choose one of the assessments you completed this week to discuss. You will also go back to the role discussion you had in Week 1 to connect the assessment to the role you chose there. Once you have identified these two items, answer the following questions in your discussion:
  • Describe the role and the assessment you will be discussing.
  • How does the assessment you have chosen advise the effectiveness of the role you selected in Week 1?
  • How will you use this knowledge to advise your personal leadership? You will find this knowledge helpful as you identify your personal leadership statement for the assignment you will complete for Week 8.

Support your ideas with course concepts and ideas. Be explicit in your use of course material. Use APA style and format for in-text citations and references.

Discussion 2

/in /by

According to Garland (2013), there is skepticism about mindfulness as an effective intervention. Often, because of its philosophical roots in Buddhism, practitioners and scholars equate mindfulness with “New Age” beliefs. As a result, some may wonder how effective mindfulness interventions are. Recall from Week 1 that it is important to answer the question about the effectiveness of interventions by using empirical evidence rather than experiences or intuition.

You may not have experienced or practiced mindfulness. After you listen to the recordings found on the website listed in the Learning Resources, reflect on some of the following questions: (1) What did you notice? (2) What were you thinking while you were listening? (3) What were you feeling while you were listening? (4) How was your body reacting while listening? (5) How did you feel after you practiced mindfulness?

In this Discussion, you will experience an example of mindfulness and also determine whether mindfulness has scientific support.

To prepare:

  • Listen to a recording from those found at this website listed in the Learning Resources: UCLA Health. (n.d.). Free guided meditations. Retrieved December 8, 2017, from http://marc.ucla.edu/mindful-meditations
  • Read this article listed in the Learning Resources: Garland, E. L. (2013). Mindfulness research in social work: Conceptual and methodological recommendations. Social Work Research, 37(4), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svt038
  • Conduct a library search in the Walden Library for one research study about the effectiveness of mindfulness as an intervention for the client in the case study you have been using. Remember when looking for studies to take into account your client’s age, developmental stage, and presenting problem.

Post:

  • In 1 to 2 sentences, respond to one of the four following questions in terms of what you noticed during the mindfulness exercise you completed:
    • What were you thinking while you were listening?
    • What were you feeling while you were listening?
    • How was your body reacting while listening?
    • How did you feel after you practiced mindfulness?
  • In 2 to 3 sentences, describe your experience practicing this technique and how this experience influences your choice on whether to use it with a client during practice.
    • Provide the reference for the study you found, and be sure to use citations in the body of your post using APA guidelines.
  • In 1 to 2 sentences, briefly summarize the methodological context (i.e., research method, how data was collected, and the instruments used) of the studies and the findings.
  • Evaluate the findings in terms of their validity and applicability for the client

Discussion

/in /by

Upon hearing the stories of sometimes horrific atrocities clients or client families have experienced, you as a social worker may find yourself confronting existential questions such as Why? For example, Why do horrible events happen to good people? Why do people abuse their children?

Trying to make sense of such trauma is not easy, and you may seek answers to these existential questions your whole life. And yet, there are opportunities for growth despite trauma for both clients and social workers. This is known as post-traumatic growth, where a renewed sense purpose or a more profound outlook on life is the by-product.

In this Discussion, you work to seek meaning from the trauma your clients experience and the subsequent healing you help your clients achieve in your social work practice.

To prepare:

  • Read about trauma-informed social work, and read this article listed in the Learning Resources: Vis, J.-A., & Boynton, H. M. (2008). Spirituality and transcendent meaning making: possibilities for enhancing posttraumatic growth. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 27(1/2): 69–86. http://dx.doi.org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/15426430802113814

Post:

  • In 1 sentence, identify an existential question with which you have grappled in relation to a client who has been traumatized.
    • Reflect on your fieldwork, or perhaps identify an existential question that might arise in working with the client in the case study you have selected throughout the course.
  • In 3 to 4 brief sentences, describe where there is potential for growth for the client as a result of the trauma.
  • In 3 to 4 brief sentences, explain where there is potential for growth for you, the social worker, as a result of listening to the client’s stories and bearing witness to their trauma.
  • Describe any challenges you may experience between the meaning you hold based on your personal beliefs and working within the client’s potentially different belief framework.

EVENT PLANNER

/in /by

 

Meeting Plan

For this assignment, you will function as a meeting planner for Joshua Tree Ice Cream. Using the Meeting Checklist developed by your professor, determine the following:

  • Explain the type of meeting that will be developed. 
    • Hallmark event, such as a: 
      • Significant company anniversary
      • Product or service launch
      • Awards and recognition ceremony
      • Annual conference
      • Training symposium.
  • Determine the primary business intentions of the event (to celebrate, acknowledge, build team member competencies, etc.) 
    • Detail specifically.
  • Identify stakeholders 
    • Decision makers
    • Function coordinators
    • Vendors
    • Suppliers
    • Event team members 
      • Briefly address the roles/contributions/impact of the stakeholders that are identified.
  • Define attendees 
    • Demographics
    • Psychographics
    • Organizational experience/role
    • Function
    • Total attendance projection.
  • Provide a draft agenda 
    • Logistics
    • Location, insight into the selected space
    • Set-up
    • Sequence
    • Flow of meeting or event.

Present a typed 2 to 3-page outline. The plan can be presented in bullets. There is no need for a narrative presentation.  

Remember to be explicit with detail. This assignment reflects the  realistic steps you would take as you defined your initial game plan and  provided clients with a sense of the environment you would create.

Managers Can Lead Career Development

/in /by

Background: 

“Karla, two members of your staff came to see me and share a few areas of concern this morning,” explained Alley when she and Karla met in a conference room.

“I wish they had come to me first,” Karla said impatiently. “What were their issues?”

“Well, to be honest, they do not feel you are really committed to their development and that you lack concern for them.”

“Alley, I say yes to 90% of development requests from training, to tuition assistance, to conferences and even out-of-branch rotations. I go out of my way to develop my people.”

“I know, Karla! You have a great record on paper.”

“What do you mean? Where else do I need to have a great record? Isn’t what can be measured what is important?”

“Karla, I think the challenge you are facing is difficulty in projecting genuine and individual concern for them. I am convinced, you do all you can, but they do not seem to feel your concern, and that is where it really counts.”

“What can I do to change that, Alley? I care about my employees. I really do! How can I show them that?”

 Question:

  • What could be the barrier or barriers that exist between Karla and her direct reports?

write a purpose for university admissions

/in /by

I need help to writing a proposal for admission on master degree on Human resource management.

if you need any additional information you can ask me than i will provide you with all of informations

Assignment 1 bus407

/in /by

Training and Development in a small businesses

INFORMED CONSENT AND MEDICAL MALPRACTICE: TORTS AND NEGLIGENCE

/in /by

 

We will continue to review Case law as a foundation for understanding various concepts necessary to understand the law in regard to health care administration. The Canterbury v. Spence case in the background materials dates to 1972, but is considered a “landmark” case in that it established the important concept of the “reasonable person” in regard to informed consent. As clearly explained, the lack of informed consent creates an environment where care providers can be held liable for negligence or torts against a patient.

After reviewing the background readings and doing independent research, examine the case Canterbury v. Spence and answer the following:

  1. Provide the background information regarding the case and the decision of the court.
  2. Explain informed consent and its required elements.
  3. What is the reasonable person standard?
  4. Why is informed consent important in medical care?
  5. What is the relationship between informed consent and ethics? Include a discussion of relevant ethical principles.
  6. What is a hospital’s responsibility in insuring informed consent?

Be sure to cite the peer-reviewed literature.

SLP Assignment Expectations

  1. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis.
  2. Limit your response to a maximum of 3 pages (title and reference page is not included in page number count).
  3. Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals:
    Angelo State University Library. (n.d.). Library guides: How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals. Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
  4. You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment:
    Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
  5. For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:
    Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
  6. This assignment will be graded based on the content in the rubric.

INFORMED CONSENT AND MEDICAL MALPRACTICE: TORTS AND NEGLIGENCE

/in /by

 

Litigation against health care providers can happen due to a myriad of factors. This assignment examines malpractice and intentional torts. Review the following article and background materials.

Sohn, D. (2013). Negligence, genuine error, and litigation. International Journal of General Medicine, 6, 49-56. Retrieved from the Trident University Library.

You are a new practice manager in a small medical practice made up of individual providers. For a monthly “lunch and learn” session, you have been asked to prepare a presentation examining the more common forms of litigation against practitioners. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation addressing the following questions. You must include thorough speaker’s notes.

Case Assignment

  1. Explain the difference between negligence (malpractice) and battery (an intentional tort).
  2. Identify and explain the four elements of proof required in a negligence tort case.
  3. What is vicarious liability and how is it different from individual liability?
  4. Explain malpractice or “tort” reform. Why is it of importance and what are some of the remedies that are considered in tort reform?
  5. What are the ethical responsibilities of a medical practice in relation to negligence and battery? Be sure and include a discussion of ethical principles.

Assignment Expectations

  1. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your presentation.
  2. Limit your response to a maximum of 10 slides (title and reference slides are not included in this total).
  3. Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals:
    Angelo State University Library. (n.d.). Library guides: How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals. Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
  4. You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment:
    Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
  5. For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:
    Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
  6. This assignment will be graded based on the content in the rubric. 

HR

/in /by

COMPLETE TWO ASSESSMENTS—CHOOSE TWO FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST.

  • Daft, R. L. (2018). The leadership experience (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage. 
    • Chapter 6, “Courage and Moral Leadership.” 
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.1: Ethical Maturity, page 172.
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.2: Your Servant Leadership Orientation, page 180.
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.3: Assess Your Moral Courage, page 184  

      Your leadership assessments this week focus on ethical maturity, servant leadership, and moral courage. Choose one of the assessments you completed this week to discuss. You will also go back to the role discussion you had in Week 1 to connect the assessment to the role you chose there. Once you have identified these two items, answer the following questions in your discussion:

  • Describe the role and the assessment you will be discussing.
  • How does the assessment you have chosen advise the effectiveness of the role you selected in Week 1?
  • How will you use this knowledge to advise your personal leadership? You will find this knowledge helpful as you identify your personal leadership statement for the assignment you will complete for Week 8.

Support your ideas with course concepts and ideas. Be explicit in your use of course material. Use APA style and format for in-text citations and references.