Introduction to Statistics

/in /by

It has long been a requirement for health care workers to take an Introduction to Statistics class. Why is it important for a person working in health care to understand statistical concepts? To answer this question, please provide two specific examples incorporating two different statistical terms from “Visual Learner Statistics,” located in the Topic 1 Resources. Do not use the same examples as those in a prior post. You may reference other articles in this topic or conduct your own scholarly research if more statistical terms are needed.

Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “HLT-362V Discussion Question Rubric” and “HLT-362V Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.

disscusion 6psych

/in /by

 Analyze and apply critical thinking skills in the psychopathology of mental health patients and provide treatment and health promotion while applying evidence-based research.Scenario:

C.Z. is a 20-year-old Caucasian male who is in his second year of college. He is seeking treatment due to persistent fears that campus security and the local police are tracking and surveilling him. He cites occasional lags in his internet speed as evidence that surveillance devices are interfering with his electronics. His intense anxiety about this has begun getting in the way of his ability to complete schoolwork, and his friends are concerned – he says they have told him, “you’re not making sense.”

C.Z. occasionally laughs abruptly and inappropriately and sometimes stops speaking mid-sentence, looking off in the distance as though he sees or hears something. He expresses concern about electronics in the room (phone, computer) potentially being monitored and asks repeatedly about patient confidentiality, stating that he wants to be sure the police won’t be informed about his treatment. His beliefs are fixed, and if they are challenged, his tone becomes hostile.

Questions:

Remember to answer these questions from your textbooks and NP guidelines. At all times, explain your answers. 

  1. Discuss the etiology, course, and the structural/functional abnormalities of schizophrenia. 
  2. Discuss the evidence-based pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment for this patient using the US Clinical Guidelines.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.
  • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) 
  • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
  • Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
  • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
  • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Safe Practices for Medication Administration

/in /by

Due 10-11-23 @10am

Nursing

/in /by

 Describe the three health care settings that you explored as proposed sites for an EBP QI project. ( Community Mental Health Clinic, Crisis inpatient. Substance Use Clinic.  

questions

/in /by

Original Work, No Plagiarism, Cite and Reference

Hugo is a graduate student working on a research study that is seeking to explore the efficacy of a new medicine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.  As part of his duties, he is asked to make himself available during participant recruitment to clarify any questions that the recruitment personnel or the participants may have. On one of these occasions, a research nurse named Phoebe is obtaining informed consent from a young adult named Simon. 

The informed consent form includes information on the purpose of the study, a double-blinded, randomized intervention trial to test the efficacy of a medicine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.  The form explains the risks and benefits of participation at length, including the anticipated side effects of the new medicine. 

The benefits are thought to outweigh the risks.  The participants in the treatment arm of the study may benefit from the medicine's hypothesized prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Participants in both groups will receive close monitoring of neuropathy symptoms and evidence-based care while being in the study. Finally, the form explains that the information collected may help to lead to the discovery of an agent that may reduce chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, of which there are currently no none effective preventative treatments. 

As Phoebe is reviewing the informed consent form, Simon appears somewhat uncomfortable and apprehensive. Hugo thinks that his response may be related to the surroundings and/or situation. They are sitting in the exam room shortly after Simon learned of the treatment options for advanced stage colorectal cancer and the doctor left without answering all of his questions. Simon also has additional oncology appointments shortly after the consent discussion. 

Hugo is also struck by Simon's interaction with Phoebe. He nods and his occasional brief responses sound more like someone receiving a set of instructions than an indication of understanding.

During the time it takes to complete the informed consent form, which is quite lengthy, Hugo begins to wonder whether Simon truly understands the research study and his part in it.  Hugo also questions whether Simon understands what randomization is and how this technique will affect him as a research participant. Hugo is distracted from his thoughts by movement from across the room. Simon is ready to place his signature on the informed consent form. He seems to be eager to do so. The form states that study subjects have the right to refuse to participate and that they may withdraw at any time, but Hugo begins to question whether Simon truly has a choice in giving his consent. Do the benefits from this study, overwhelm any concerns he may feel regarding being in the study?

Hugo is unsure how to address his discomfort with the informed consent process that he has just witnessed and he begins to deliberate about what course of action he should take to address his concerns.

Discussion Questions:

1. How could the informed consent form or the process of obtaining informed consent be modified to address Hugo's concerns?

2. What types of questions or techniques could have Phoebe provided to assess Simon's understanding of the study?

3. How would you describe “randomization” to a prospective study participant?

4. How would you respond to a participant who says “can we skip the rest of this and sign the form” during the informed consent discussion?

 

D10

/in /by

follow all directions

part 3 work

/in /by

part 3 work

Article Review

/in /by

Article Review on two nursing articles, I already picked them. In APA format, provide a summary/paraphrase of both articles and a review/evaluation and opinion on both articles. Provides minimum of 150-250 words with word count noted following annotated bib notation for each of the provided
articles.

SOAP note asthma

/in /by

SOAP note asthma attack

nursing

/in /by

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.