Objectives of Capital Investment Decision

  • Special Decisions (Chapter 9)

(200-250 words include a reference & citation)

  • Determine expenses for the project (fixed and variable)
  • Determine revenues if applicable
  • Determine if project is favorable
  • Gain support for the project from key stakeholders

Discussion

How does financial planning and strategic planning influence health care organizations? Provide an example. 175 word minimum 200 word max

: Consider yourself as a job analyst of any company and discuss various job analysis method and prepare job description and job specification for at least two positions in your company.

READ THE FILE READ THE FILE READ THE FILE READ THE FILE READ THE FILE READ THE FILE READ THE FILE 

Discussion: Consent for “Non-Competent” Parties

  

The Law of Healthcare Administration

Book Jacket

Authors:

Showalter, J. Stuart

Publication Information:

Ed.: Eighth edition. Chicago, Illinois : Health Administration Press. 2017

Resource Type:

eBook.

Description:

The Law of Healthcare Administration offers a thorough examination of health law in the United States from a management perspective. Using plain language accessible to nonlawyers, the book moves from broadbrush treatments of the US legal system and the history of medicine to specific issues that affect healthcare leaders daily, including contracts, torts, taxation, antitrust laws, regulatory compliance, and, most pressing, health insurance reform and the important changes that have taken place since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) became law in 2010. The legal concepts discussed in the book are amply supported by reallife examples, detailed explanations, and excerpts from decisions of federal and state courts.

Subjects:

Medical laws and legislation–United States
Medical care–Law and legislation–United States
Hospitals–Law and legislation–United States

we reviewed informed consent in the case of competent adults. There are many “gray” areas of consent in cases of children or incompetent adults; however, the law has sought to provide clear guidance for health care providers and legal guardians.

  • Review pages 393-411 in the Showalter textbook and      choose at least one of the subtopics in this section regarding consent.      Provide an explanation of the “gray area” of your choosing, including any      relevant legal cases discussed, and how this is handled under the law.

Showalter, J. S. (2017) Consent. In The Law of Healthcare Administration (pp. 393-411). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

Related 

rrent User Level:Unlimited User Hide Table of ContentsTable of Contents Brief Contents

·  Detailed Contents

·  Preface

·  Chapter 1 The Anglo-American Legal System

·  Chapter 2 A Brief History of Medicine

·  Chapter 3 Health Reform, Access to Care, and Admission and Discharge

·  Chapter 4 Contracts and Intentional Torts

·  Chapter 5 Negligence

·  Chapter 6 The Organization and Management of a Corporate Healthcare Institution

·  Chapter 7 Liability of the Healthcare Institution

·  Chapter 8 Medical Staff Privileges and Peer Review

·  Chapter 9 Health Information Management

·  Chapter 10 Emergency Care

·  Chapter 11 Consent for Treatment and Withholding Consent

·  Chapter 12 Taxation of Healthcare Institutions

·  Chapter 13 Competition and Antitrust Law

·  Chapter 14 Issues of Reproduction and Birth

·  Chapter 15 Fraud Laws and Corporate Compliance

·  Glossary

·  Case Index

·  Index

·  About the Author

HR

COMPLETE TWO ASSESSMENTS—CHOOSE TWO FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST.

  • Daft, R. L. (2018). The leadership experience (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage. 
    • Chapter 6, “Courage and Moral Leadership.” 
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.1: Ethical Maturity, page 172.
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.2: Your Servant Leadership Orientation, page 180.
      • Leader’s Self-Insight 6.3: Assess Your Moral Courage, page 184  

      Your leadership assessments this week focus on ethical maturity, servant leadership, and moral courage. Choose one of the assessments you completed this week to discuss. You will also go back to the role discussion you had in Week 1 to connect the assessment to the role you chose there. Once you have identified these two items, answer the following questions in your discussion:

  • Describe the role and the assessment you will be discussing.
  • How does the assessment you have chosen advise the effectiveness of the role you selected in Week 1?
  • How will you use this knowledge to advise your personal leadership? You will find this knowledge helpful as you identify your personal leadership statement for the assignment you will complete for Week 8.

Support your ideas with course concepts and ideas. Be explicit in your use of course material. Use APA style and format for in-text citations and references.

INFORMED CONSENT AND MEDICAL MALPRACTICE: TORTS AND NEGLIGENCE

 

Litigation against health care providers can happen due to a myriad of factors. This assignment examines malpractice and intentional torts. Review the following article and background materials.

Sohn, D. (2013). Negligence, genuine error, and litigation. International Journal of General Medicine, 6, 49-56. Retrieved from the Trident University Library.

You are a new practice manager in a small medical practice made up of individual providers. For a monthly “lunch and learn” session, you have been asked to prepare a presentation examining the more common forms of litigation against practitioners. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation addressing the following questions. You must include thorough speaker’s notes.

Case Assignment

  1. Explain the difference between negligence (malpractice) and battery (an intentional tort).
  2. Identify and explain the four elements of proof required in a negligence tort case.
  3. What is vicarious liability and how is it different from individual liability?
  4. Explain malpractice or “tort” reform. Why is it of importance and what are some of the remedies that are considered in tort reform?
  5. What are the ethical responsibilities of a medical practice in relation to negligence and battery? Be sure and include a discussion of ethical principles.

Assignment Expectations

  1. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your presentation.
  2. Limit your response to a maximum of 10 slides (title and reference slides are not included in this total).
  3. Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals:
    Angelo State University Library. (n.d.). Library guides: How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals. Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
  4. You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment:
    Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
  5. For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:
    Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
  6. This assignment will be graded based on the content in the rubric. 

INFORMED CONSENT AND MEDICAL MALPRACTICE: TORTS AND NEGLIGENCE

 

We will continue to review Case law as a foundation for understanding various concepts necessary to understand the law in regard to health care administration. The Canterbury v. Spence case in the background materials dates to 1972, but is considered a “landmark” case in that it established the important concept of the “reasonable person” in regard to informed consent. As clearly explained, the lack of informed consent creates an environment where care providers can be held liable for negligence or torts against a patient.

After reviewing the background readings and doing independent research, examine the case Canterbury v. Spence and answer the following:

  1. Provide the background information regarding the case and the decision of the court.
  2. Explain informed consent and its required elements.
  3. What is the reasonable person standard?
  4. Why is informed consent important in medical care?
  5. What is the relationship between informed consent and ethics? Include a discussion of relevant ethical principles.
  6. What is a hospital’s responsibility in insuring informed consent?

Be sure to cite the peer-reviewed literature.

SLP Assignment Expectations

  1. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis.
  2. Limit your response to a maximum of 3 pages (title and reference page is not included in page number count).
  3. Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals:
    Angelo State University Library. (n.d.). Library guides: How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals. Retrieved from https://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
  4. You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment:
    Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
  5. For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:
    Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
  6. This assignment will be graded based on the content in the rubric.

Assignment 1 bus407

Training and Development in a small businesses

write a purpose for university admissions

I need help to writing a proposal for admission on master degree on Human resource management.

if you need any additional information you can ask me than i will provide you with all of informations

Managers Can Lead Career Development

Background: 

“Karla, two members of your staff came to see me and share a few areas of concern this morning,” explained Alley when she and Karla met in a conference room.

“I wish they had come to me first,” Karla said impatiently. “What were their issues?”

“Well, to be honest, they do not feel you are really committed to their development and that you lack concern for them.”

“Alley, I say yes to 90% of development requests from training, to tuition assistance, to conferences and even out-of-branch rotations. I go out of my way to develop my people.”

“I know, Karla! You have a great record on paper.”

“What do you mean? Where else do I need to have a great record? Isn’t what can be measured what is important?”

“Karla, I think the challenge you are facing is difficulty in projecting genuine and individual concern for them. I am convinced, you do all you can, but they do not seem to feel your concern, and that is where it really counts.”

“What can I do to change that, Alley? I care about my employees. I really do! How can I show them that?”

 Question:

  • What could be the barrier or barriers that exist between Karla and her direct reports?