BHA435 Module 4 Case SLP

9/25/23, 6:00 PM SLP – BHA435 Healthcare Quality Assessment and Improvement (2023AUG14FT-1)

https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/le/content/201354/viewContent/5059895/View 1/1

Privacy Policy | Contact

Module 4 – SLP

CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement is often merged together as
one, however, there are distinct difference between the two terms.

In a 2-page report, complete the following:

Explain in detail and provide a healthcare example of quality assurance in
healthcare.

Explains in detail and provide a healthcare example of continuous quality
improvement in healthcare.

Identify if these concepts work together or independently and explain your
rationale.

SLP Assignment Expectations

Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your
training.

1. Limit your response to a maximum of 2 pages (title and reference pages are not
included in page number count).

2. Support your responses with peer-reviewed articles, with 2 to 3 references. Use
the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed
journals:
How to Recognize Peer-Reviewed (Refereed) Journals
http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php.

3. You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment:
Purdue Owl – https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.

4. For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following source:
https://nccih.nih.gov/health/webresources.

5. This assignment will be graded based on the content in the rubric.

Listen

Replies 5300

 Ineed replies of those works  with 200 words  each ones.Reference within 5 years.

1.Research methods commonly used in nursing can be classified in different ways. The following is a discussion of the most common classifications. First, research methods are classified as quantitative, qualitative, or mixed. This is the most common classification.

Quantitative Research

Quantitative research involves the collection and analysis of numerical data. It is used to confirm a hypothesis. This method’s ontology can be described as objective, material, and structural. Quantitative methods rely on scientific realism justified by empirical confirmation. According to Creswell and Creswell (2023, pp. 45-46), the most common research objectives are numerical description, causal establishment and explanation, and prediction. Quantitative research relies on precise measurement using validated and structured tools. Common quantitative methods in nursing research include surveys, experiments, and observational studies. Conclusions are drawn from statistical analysis.

Qualitative Research

Qualitative research involves the construction of knowledge hypothesis and grounded theory from the data collected during fieldwork. The ontology can be described as subjective, mental, personal, and constructed. It delves into understanding human experiences, behaviors, and social phenomena. According to Creswell and Creswell (2023, p. 46), this research method involves collecting qualitative data such as in-depth interviews, participant observations, and open-ended questions. Qualitative methods in nursing research include interviews, focus groups, content analysis, and ethnographic studies. Qualitative designs include descriptive methods, narrative, phenomenological, grounded theory, ethnography, and case studies.

Mixed Methods

Mixed-methods research combines aspects of quantitative and qualitative approaches within a single study. It allows researchers to comprehensively understand a research question by collecting and analyzing numerical and contextual data. In nursing research, mixed-methods studies are often employed to explore complex healthcare issues from multiple angles.

Second, research can be classified as experimental or non-experimental. Experimental research involves the manipulation of one or more variables to determine the effect of an outcome. An example is a Randomized controlled study. On the other hand, there are non-experimental research methods that focus on the observation of phenomena as they occur. Examples include observational studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies. Finally, nursing research can be classified based on the time of data collection. When the data is collected at a single point in time, this is called cross-sectional research, while data collection for an extended period creates a longitudinal study (Butler et al., 2021).

2. Research approaches in nursing can be divided into a number of groups, each with its own specific traits and goals. Quantitative research is one of the main categories, and it entails the systematic collection and analysis of numerical data in order to establish cause-and-effect correlations or characterize patterns (Griffiths et al., 2020). Descriptive and correlational research, which are subsets of quantitative research, concentrate on describing phenomena or looking for links between variables, respectively, whereas experimental research uses controlled studies to modify variables. In nursing research, conducting large-scale surveys, evaluating the efficacy of interventions, and tracking patient outcomes are all made possible by quantitative research.

Another well-known subcategory is qualitative research, which aims to investigate people’s viewpoints and real-world experiences. Aspects of this methodology include phenomenology, which aims to comprehend a phenomenon from the perspective of the participants, grounded theory, which develops hypotheses based on actual facts, and ethnography, which explores the cultural backdrop of healthcare practices (Griffiths et al., 2020). For acquiring an understanding of the subjective facets of nursing, such as patient experiences, emotional reactions, and cultural impacts on healthcare, qualitative research is crucial.

Using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, mixed-methods research provides a thorough grasp of intricate nursing phenomena. Both numerical and narrative data are gathered by researchers through surveys, experiments, observations, or in-person discussions (Griffiths et al., 2020). When a researcher wants to triangulate findings or offer a more comprehensive viewpoint on a study subject, this strategy can be quite helpful.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are vital methodologies in nursing research because they serve a critical role in integrating and appraising current studies related to a specific healthcare condition. A systematic review employs a rigorous and organized approach to locating, selecting, and evaluating relevant research studies. These studies aim to provide a comprehensive review of the available data on a certain healthcare topic. Researchers painstakingly assemble information from multiple sources, evaluate the quality of each study, and then summarize the findings to provide a transparent and objective picture of the current state of knowledge in the subject (Griffiths et al., 2020). Meta-analysis, on the other hand, goes a step further by statistically combining the data of multiple studies to derive more solid and broadly applicable conclusions. These strategies collectively provide a substantial addition to nursing’s use of evidence-based practice by presenting a complete body of research.

Action research is a popular methodology in clinical practice and nursing education. It stands out for its inclusive teamwork style that includes both scholars and practitioners. This approach’s main objective is to pinpoint specific obstacles or problems in the healthcare setting, and then work together to develop and provide solutions. By incorporating researchers and practitioners in problem-solving, data collecting, analysis, and improvement implementation, action research emphasizes a cycle of continuous improvement (Griffiths et al., 2020). It is especially helpful in clinical practice, where it can motivate efforts to improve quality, and in nursing education, where it can trigger curriculum modifications and creative teaching methods. Action research seeks to make positive changes that enhance patient care and outcomes in the healthcare environment by concentrating on practical, real-world concerns and encouraging cooperation between researchers and practitioners.

In conclusion, there are several different types of nursing research methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and action research. With the ultimate goal of advancing nursing knowledge and enhancing patient care, researchers choose the most suitable approach depending on their research objectives, ethical considerations, available resources, and the nature of the phenomenon under examination.

critical care wk 3

MY NUMBER ASSIGNED WAS 1 WHICH IS: Level of Consciousness – Stuporous, Obtunded, Coma, Lethargy, etc. 

Initial post:Each student will be assigned a number randomly.  Whatever your number is, select the corresponding topic below, then post a minimum of 5 bullet points about the topic.Your bullet points should address key components of the topic, such as what, how, who, & why.  This information should not be basic things you learned in Med/Surg, but rather advanced critical care based. Think about this as a group effort to create a study guide. Use ONLY your textbook, but do not cut & paste from the book.Then create, find, or borrow a test style question about your topic & post at the bottom of your bullet points. The format needs to be multiple choice or select all that apply. Think NCLEX style. Each week include a paragraph with the results from one of your weekly interviews.Discussion post assignments are worth 20 points each as follows: 

  • 5 points for the quality of your bullet points.
  • 5 points for the quality of your question.
  • 5 points for answering the question of a peer as your response.
  • 5 points for the quality of your rationale.
    • Quality is defined as thorough and thoughtful while demonstrating professional level knowledge of the topic.

Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Writing Essay Assignment Week 1

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Weekly Essay/Writing Assignment Content

1.

Top of Form

This week's writing assignment will consist of the following: Select a particular area of nursing that is of interest to you and write a 
short essay of at least 2 to 3 pages about the specifics of nursing research in relation to this area, what can be accomplished by it, and why you believe it to be valuable. Include an explanation of the following questions in your response. 

• What role does nursing research play in the development of applied medicine?

• What are the best methods for conducting such research? Include specific topics you will cover and how this relates to your literature review. You may need to use the Internet for help.

Please review the Assignment Rubric. All students are encouraged to visit the library as you must conduct research from EBP practice journals and research studies. 

 CRITERIA

 OUTSTANDING

 VERY GOOD

 GOOD

 UNACCEPTABLE

 Integration of Knowledge

 

 

25% of the total grade

 
100%

The paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

Page requirements are met.

 
80%

The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.

The page requirement is one page below the required amount.

 
60%

The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

The page requirement is two pages below the required amount.

 
40%

The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

The page requirement is more than two pages below the required amount.

  
Topic Focus

 

25% of the total Grade

 
100%

The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.

 

 
80%

The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.

 
60%

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.

 
40%

The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.

  
Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness

25% of the total grade

 
100%

In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper.

Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with no headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources.

 80%

In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.

Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

 60
%

The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources.

 
40%

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections

  It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding any relationship

  

  
Spelling and Grammar

12% of the total grade

 
100%

Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors

The required word count has been met.

 
80%

More than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors

The required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count.

 
60%

More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors

The required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count.

 
40%

An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.

The required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count.

  
Sources

7% of the total grade

 
100%

4 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative.

 
80%

3 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative.

 
60%

Fewer than 3 current sources or fewer than 2 of 3 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible.

 
40%

Fewer than 3 current sources or fewer than 2 of 3 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.

  
Citations

6% of the total grade

 

 
100%

Fewer than 5 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors

 
80%

More than 5 but fewer than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, and APA format errors.

 
60%

More than 10 incomplete citations and/or quotations, or APA format errors.

 
40%

The citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources.

  

Bottom of Form

Nursing

Module/Week 8: Community Assessment Project

Module Overview

During this week, you will focus on your community health assessment project.

Overall Topics

Community Health Assessment project

Module Learning Objectives

By the end of this week, students will be able to:

• Complete Community Health Assessment.

Learning Assignments

1. Focus on completing your community health assessment.

2. This is a PowerPoint submission.

Items Due
1. Community Health Assessment due on 10/15/23 at 11:59 pm

2. *Complete verification screenshot that you placed your Community Health Assessment

in your NURS 1100 portfolio due on 10/15/23 at 11:59 pm

Community Assessment Instructions and Grading Rubric

20 points

Community Assessment- Community health is a critical dimension in baccalaureate nursing.
This assignment allows you the opportunity to perform course objectives in “real life” by
assessing a community as client, arriving at a community diagnosis, proposing interventions, and
deciding how you would measure the outcomes. In this assignment, you will begin to evaluate
the health needs of a community. To meet the needs of the members of a community, public
health nurses must first identify barriers to health care and identify the priorities of the
community.

You will use the Nies & McEwen (2019) textbook Assessment Framework for a community
health assessment to explore a geographical community (Chapter 6). For help with writing the
questions to ask, see text Chapter 6, Box 6-2: Questions to Guide Community Observations
During a Windshield Survey. There are many different sources of data needed to complete a
comprehensive community assessment including the use of the NURS 400 LibGuide. Students
will explore these data sources to help the preparation of their community assessment. You will
explore these data sources to help with the preparation of your community assessment. The
Community Health Assessment PowerPoint (including all the grading criteria on the grading
rubric) is compiled, including multiple sources of data, following the completion of the
community assessment. Explain the value of collaborating with other professionals, the use of
data resources, and evidence-based practice to guide community health nursing. This is an
individual assignment. You may assess a city or county or neighborhood. Be aware that it is
sometimes difficult to find city or neighborhood health data, so it is fine to use county data in
this case. Please say in the assignment that you were not able to find city or neighborhood data,
so are using county data.

1. Start by selecting a community.
2. Next, complete a Walking or Windshield Survey of the community. View your chosen

community as your patient taking pictures (do not use stock photos from the internet)
and assessing what is healthy in the community and what is not or may lead to public
health concerns that could possibly be addressed in your nursing diagnosis. You must
include photos you took during your windshield/walking survey in your final
presentation.

3. Then, check the Week 8 module under course content and locate the NU400 resources in
the Mustang Library – NURS 400 LibGuide to do online searches for data about the
community. It might be helpful to check with your local Chambers of Commerce as a
great community resource!

4. You will need to include multiple/credible (at least 4 sources of data) sources of data in
your assessment.

5. The 4 sources of data must be:

• The walking or windshield tour

• Two sources of data must be included/used from the Mustang McFarland Library
NU400 Lib (Data) Guide: http://libguides.smsu.edu/nurs400

• The data guide set up for NU400 at the Mustang Library has a menu at the top that
includes databases for many of the items you need for the Community Assessment!

• An interview with a key informant (keep their identity confidential for this
assignment) that addresses public health in the community. Refer to your APA 7th
ed. Resources to properly cite personal communications. The course instructor
reserves the right to request key informant contact information for auditing and
plagiarism purposes.

• Keep in mind, a community key informant is a professional in the community but not
a nurse (interprofessional collaboration) (examples may include mayor, teacher,
physician, environmental scientist, public health professional, minister, city council
member, health educator, etc.) Interview the key informant using open-ended
questions that you develop from the examples in the textbook.

Questions to include in the key interview should include but not be limited to the
following:

a. How do you define health?
b. What helps you or your community be healthy?
c. What makes it difficult to be healthy in your community?
d. What are the health concerns for your community? Your culture?
e. What resources do you access to help you be healthy?

• Please incorporate photos from your Windshield/Walking Survey within your
PowerPoint to show the community! Avoid using pictures of children. Include photos in

your PowerPoint to showcase the community (paint a picture) but remember this is
not an advertisement for the community but rather an assessment of its health.

• Please include major headings in your PowerPoint for the required elements including
adhering to 7th ed. APA formatting

Formulating the Community Health Diagnosis:

1. For this assignment, you will identify a priority health need and write a community health
diagnosis. You will write a community health diagnosis using the following format from
the Nies and McEwen (2019) text on page 103 in Chapter 6 (Fig. 6.3): Community
Assessment.

2. Start by using the community assessment that you have just completed in this assignment.
Next, using the format, write a diagnosis that is used to address the measure of concern
and add this to your PowerPoint.

3. The format for community health diagnosis is, “Increased risk of
______________(disability or disease) among ____________________(community or
population) related to ______________________(etiological statement) as demonstrated
in/as evidenced by ___________________ (health indicators).”

**Please include major headings in your PowerPoint for the required rubric elements

Community Assessment

Rubric

Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

1. Describe and define your

chosen

community/community

vitality (e.g.,

location/geography, what

does your community look

like).

*must include vital

statistics such as births,

deaths, including

population density,

population at last census,

any unique fluctuations,

age, race, income, gender,

etc., from NURS 400

LibGuide

Clearly describes

community. The

observation is

thorough, and all

issues are

addressed.

Includes census

data is provided.

(15-20 points)

Minimally describes

community and

lacks details

regarding census

data.

(9-14 points)

Does not describe

the community

and/or provides

little to no census

data.

(0 –8 points)

2. Community Assessment

– Walking or Windshield

Survey (refer to Nies &

McEwen Box 6. 2

Questions to Guide

Community Observations

During a Windshield

Survey). Describes and

evaluates main findings

from windshield survey

and the descriptions as a

guide as you drive or walk

through the defined

community.

• Provide a clear

overview of the

community

• Helps to identify

needs, clarifying

problems, and

identifying

strengths and

Clearly describes

and evaluates a

thorough

Windshield

Survey of the

community.

(15-20 points)

Minimally

describes/evaluates

most aspects of the

community using a

Windshield Survey.

(9-14 points)

Does not adequately

describe the

community using a

Windshield Survey.

The information is

incomplete, with

many/all assessment

aspects missing.

(0 –8 points)

resources within

the/your identified

community.

• Included your own

pictures (not stock

photos) with

comments/

information from

Windshield survey

3. Vital Statistics/Data

Collection

Describe indicators of the

following social/economic

needs in your community

assessment:

• Describe people

(who is part of the

community)

• Population data

such as age, gender,

race/ethnicity,

marital

status/family

• Religion, education

levels, income,

employment,

unemployment,

closed businesses,

housing

Clearly describes

social/economic

characteristics of

the community

including vital

statistics listed in

bulleted points.

(8-10 points)

Minimally describes

social/economic

characteristics of the

community and

includes part of the

vital statistics listed

in bulleted points.

(5-7 points)

Does not describe

social/economic

characteristics

and/or does not

include vital

statistics listed in

bulleted points.

(0-4 points)

4. Describe community

environmental/physical

conditions and

characteristics related to

health (e.g., climate, air

quality, pollution, disaster

history, housing, sanitation,

etc.).

Clearly describes

environmental

conditions related

to community

assessment

findings.

(4-5points)

Minimally describes

environmental

conditions related to

community

assessment findings.

(2-3 points)

Does not describe

environmental

conditions related to

community

assessment findings.

(0 points)

5.Describe health resources

within your community

assessment (e.g., health

personnel/offices, doctors,

dentists, hospitals, health

department, treatment

centers, homeless shelters,

etc.) AND describe the

community attitude toward

health/health care.

Clearly describes

health resources

within

community.

(6-8 points)

Minimally describes

health resources

within community.

(3-5 points)

Does not describe

health resources

within community.

(0 points)

6.Describe social

functioning (e.g., the level

of social and emotional

support community

members receives from

friends and/or family, etc.)

Clearly describes

social functioning

within

community.

(4-5 points)

Minimally describes

social functioning

within community

(2-3 points)

Does not describe

social functioning

within community.

(0 points)

7. Key Informant

Interview: Include one key

informant interview that is

a non-nurse professional

(interprofessional

collaboration) from the

community– interviewed

with data included in the

assessment (can be a

selected community

member, which includes,

informal leaders, church

deacons, school nurses,

social workers, or other

community members that

represent or work with

your community of

interest) See your Nies &

McEwen textbook for help

with questions for your

interview. Note the

purpose of this interview is

to address public health

issues in the community.

See the assignment

description found in the

Accurately

includes one key

informant

interview

providing

sufficient data

from community

assessment.

(4-5 points)

Does not accurately

include key

informant interview

and contains

adequate data from

community

assessment.

(2-3 points)

No key informant

identified and/or

major aspects of the

key informant

interview/data are

missing or

inadequate.

(0 points)

syllabus for questions that

must be asked of the

informant.

8. Analyze community data

and describe the

community problem:

Problem Statement

• Description of

problem with

problem statement

• Rationale for

problem chosen

• What are the

strengths and

problems for this

community?

• What are the risk

factors?

• What factors

contribute to the

problems?

Clearly analyzes

and describes

community data

and problem(s)

within the

community.

(8-10 points)

Minimally

analyzes/describes

community data and

problem(s) within

the community.

(5-7 points)

Does not adequately

analyze or describe

community data and

problem(s) within

the community.

(0-4 points)

9. Describe two other
credible sources of health
data about the community
(from sources at the
NU400 Library Guides)

**Explain the value of
applying population data to
identify priority concerns
and health outcomes

** Explain the value of
EBP as integral to
determining the best
clinical practice in
community health nursing

At least two other
sources of health
data included

The value of
population data
and EBP clearly
explained

(3.25 to 2.25
points)

One source of health

data included from

the NURS 400

Library Guides

(1.25-2.0 points)

No source from the

NURS 400 Library

Guide was used

(0-1.0 points)

10. Formulate a

Community Health

Nursing Diagnosis

(justifying identified

Clearly identifies

and formulates

community health

diagnosis based

on assessment

Minimally

identifies/formulates

community health

diagnosis based on

assessment findings.

Does not identify

and/or formulate a

community health

diagnosis based on

assessment findings.

priority primary need—the

most important need).

The format for community

health diagnosis is (4-part

statement), “Increased risk

of

______________(disability

or disease) among

____________________(c

ommunity or population

focus) related to

______________________

(etiological statement) as

demonstrated in/as

evidenced by

_________________(healt

h indicators).”

findings. Linkages

between

assessment

findings and

identified risks

and health

indicators are

clear.

(5-7 points)

(4-6 points) (0-3 points)

11. Identify limitations or

barriers to data collection

that you experienced

At least three

limitations or

barriers were

clearly described

(3.25 to 2.25
points)

Partial limitations or

barriers to data

collection were

included

(1.25-2.0 points)

Limitations or

barriers to data

collection were not

included

(0-1.0 points)

12. Writing Mechanics

(e.g., grammar and

spelling) through

PowerPoint.

Compile information into

PowerPoint formatting per

7th ed APA manual.

**Please include major

headings in your

PowerPoint for the

required rubric elements.

Correctly uses

APA format

including section

headers, citations,

and reference

page. Spelling,

grammar,

sentence structure

is essentially error

free.

(2 points)

Frequent errors (4-5

errors) occur with

spelling, grammar,

sentence structure

throughout

PowerPoint.

(1 points)

Numerous errors

(>6 errors) occur

with APA

format/writing

mechanics

consistently

throughout

PowerPoint.

(0 points)

13. The project must

include at least four

different (credible)/current

evidence-based sources of

data that are presented

within the last 5-7 years,

Includes a

minimum of four

current references

within the last 5-

10 years.

(1.5 points)

Includes a minimum

of two current

references within the

last 5-10 years and

(.75 points)

Not all references

are appropriate and

not from scholarly

sources. Fewer than

four references

used.

applicable to your

community/ aggregate

population.

(0 points)

FINAL SCORE (100

points total): points are

weighted in the

gradebook

*Complete the Verification Screenshot of the Community Assessment Assignment placed in

the NURS1100 portfolio by the due date to receive grade credit.

Week 3 Project

HUM 1050 – Introduction to Literature

Assignment #1: Analytical Essay – Initial Submission

Write an APA-formatted essay of 1000 words on (a) Chopin's biography; (b) analysis of “The story of an hour” (Chopin, 2023); and (c) a critical review of the story. 

This essay should:

· be 1000 words long

· have an explicit thesis statement, with the main idea (the topic of the paper) and a controlling idea (what you, as the author, is saying about the topic)

· include an integrated, direct quote from the text to support the thesis in each of the body paragraphs

· be written using APA formatting guidelines

· use APA guidelines for citation, both in-text and on a References page

· write in 3rd-person only

· be submitted as a MS Word .docx file

Plagiarism will result in a zero for the assignment.

Reference

Chopin, K. (2023). The story of an hour. https://www.katechopin.org/story-hour/

3 Ps Remediation

see attachment

fundamentals M 1 b

Delivering Client Centered Care

 

kaffy

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a vital component of contemporary healthcare, transforming the landscape of patient-centered care across the lifespan. A significant body of evidence, such as the peer-reviewed article titled “Shared decision-making in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of its effects on patient outcomes” by Stacey J. Pereira et al. published in the Annals of Family Medicine in 2021, underscores the merits of SDM in promoting health and delivering client-centered care.

SDM epitomizes a collaborative process where patients and healthcare providers harmoniously engage in making healthcare decisions. This process revolves around the amalgamation of the best available clinical evidence with the unique values and preferences of the patient. The systematic review and meta-analysis examined 57 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), offering compelling insights into the affirmative influence of SDM on various patient outcomes. These encompassed heightened patient satisfaction, an improved quality of life, reduced decisional regret, greater adherence to treatment regimens, and superior clinical outcomes such as enhanced blood pressure control, glucose management, and cholesterol levels.

There are two overarching reasons that substantiate SDM as an essential and exemplary healthcare practice. Firstly, SDM is rooted in the principle of respecting the autonomy and right to self-determination of patients. It elevates the patient to an active, informed decision-maker in their care, ensuring that their voice is both heard and honored in the decision-making process. Secondly, SDM consistently demonstrates its prowess in enhancing patient outcomes. This patient-centered approach fosters an environment where patients feel valued and involved, leading to increased satisfaction, a better quality of life, and a notable reduction in decisional regret. Moreover, it fortifies patient adherence to treatment plans and significantly betters clinical outcomes.

In the realm of healthcare, SDM transcends being a mere process; it becomes a conduit for the realization of optimal care and health promotion. It effectively personalizes care delivery, ensuring that interventions align with each patient's unique needs, values, and preferences. Importantly, SDM nurtures trust and rapport between patients and healthcare providers, serving as the bedrock of effective communication. When patients feel heard and respected, it paves the way for open and honest dialogues, which, in turn, bolster healthcare decisions and ultimately lead to improved health outcomes. Additionally, SDM is instrumental in empowering patients to be active participants in their health journeys. It fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility for their well-being, thus propelling health promotion efforts to new heights.

In conclusion, the evidence gleaned from the systematic review and meta-analysis by Stacey J. Pereira et al. underscores the pivotal role of SDM in modern healthcare. By respecting patient autonomy and consistently yielding positive patient outcomes, SDM epitomizes a best practice that is integral to the delivery of client-centered care and the promotion of health across the life span. Its capacity to personalize care, foster trust, and empower patients underscores its status as a cornerstone of contemporary healthcare delivery.

Okafor Aboh

he/him/his

19 hours ago, at 10:45 PM

Top of Form

In healthcare allowing the patient to have the autonomy over their own healthcare decisions is an important part in delivering client center care and promoting health. It is important that all parties of the healthcare team work together to achieve the desired needs of the patient. An important “best practice technique” to perform to achieve this is to provide patient centered communication. This means that the patients care is centered around the clients values, health concerns, and beliefs. It is also important for the patient to have an effective trustworthy relationship with nurse or provider on their team so they can effectively establish any possible personal or behavioral related barriers that may interfere with the care of the client. 

Patient centered care reflects strictly on the specific needs of the individual patient and the best effective ways to provide them. Providing healthcare services that reflect and respect the needs of the patient results in positive outcomes for the clients health outside of the facility. Patient centered care requires the healthcare team to show respect towards the client, their needs, preferences, and values. When all parties are on the same page it makes an easier recovery process for the client and a smoother visit for the healthcare professionals. 

Nursing Discussion assignment

Respond to the following prompts and, if it's relevant, include your own personal experience

· What are some barriers and challenges to the transition of care from one level to another? Describe at least two. Examples: transition from hospital to primary care follow-up or long-term care to home care.

· Give an example from your experience or the literature of a procedure aimed at improving the process of care transitions. What impact do you suppose it will have on patient safety?

Write at least 2 paragraphs with intext citations and references in APA 7th edition format.

· Choose 

one
 life stage (adolescents, middle age, or older adults). Based on your readings, personal experiences, and/or research of evidence-based practices, discuss the following:

· What are the priority health promotion assessments for those clients? How would you approach that assessment?

· Would you change your approach to 
teaching health promotion?

Write at least 2 paragraphs with intext citations and references in APA 7th edition format.


Healthcare system flaws during the pandemic

 

Refer to the required reading: COVID-19 and the Need for Health Care Reform (King, 2020)  NEJM. 

Identify 1 flaw in the US healthcare system that was made evident during the pandemic, and 1 innovation during the pandemic that improved healthcare.

** Add two (2) additional references to make a total of three references