NUR 445 – Week 5 Discussion: Ethical Issues

Step 1 In your initial post of approximately 150 words, identify an ethical or legal issues or dilemmas that you have encountered in your practice. Use defining ethical terms in your post (for example, fidelity, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and so on).How was the situation resolved? Did the resolution follow ethical principles? 

Step 2 Read other students’ posts and respond to at least two of them by Friday at 11:59pm MT.
 Use one creditable source to support each response post.

Discuss

You are likely already upholding ethics in nursing and healthcare delivery in your current nursing practice experience. As mentioned in the introduction for this week, a patient-focused approach that promotes the delivery of safe, quality, and cost-effective healthcare for promoting positive patient outcomes represents a fundamental alignment to ethical principles for the delivery of healthcare. In your journey toward becoming a DNP-prepared nurse, you will continue to uphold ethical principles in your nursing practice and will likely continue to serve as an advocate for adhering to these principles in all you do.

For this Discussion, reflect on the case studies/scenarios related to ethical challenges presented in this week’s Learning Resources. Think about how these ethical challenges may mirror your own experiences in nursing practice. Consider what other ethical challenges may arise in your own nursing practice or as you continue your program of study.

Post an explanation of at least two significant ethical issues relevant to the DNP-prepared nurse. Then explain how these issues might compare to the types of issues you have encountered in your practice. Be specific and provide examples.

Required Readings

Fibrinolytic agents

 

Discussion:

Fibrinolytic agents present the only available pharmacotherapy able to dissolve a thrombus and open occluded vessels.  Despite the worldwide experience with fibrinolytic therapy, there are limitations that must be considered. 

As with all other management strategies for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), contraindications for fibrinolytics in patients diagnosed with an ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) must be considered.  

Discuss in detail the absolute and relative contraindications for fibrinolytic therapy in STEMI. 

Instructions:

Post your discussion to the Moodle Discussion Forum.  Word limit 500 words.  Reply to at least two other student posts with a reflection of their response.  Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.  

nurse physiology discussion post

Given the critical role of fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance in maintaining overall health, how can nurse practitioners effectively assess and identify subtle imbalances in their patients?

interview and physical appraisal of the community.

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a community assessment in a form of an interview and physical appraisal of the community.

Nursing Assignment- Methods/Design, Statistical Analysis

Please see the attachment for the Instructions

sociology project final

The purpose of this essay is to apply C. W. Mills’s Sociological Imagination
concept to explain a personal situation. The essay will demonstrate the
student’s ability to use sociological concepts & theories learned in the
course, to describe a personal situation. The topic is left to the student’s
discretion.

The Essay paper should have the following 5 content areas:

1. Introduction: In this first content area, write a paragraph introducing C.
W. Mills’s concept of sociological imagination, and give a general overview
of how you will be applying it to the personal situation that you will discuss
in your paper.

2. Personal Explanation: In this second content area, describe your
personal situation/topic. Based on whether the situation is a current one or
a past one, describe how you dealt or are dealing with it. You can also pick
a situation from a person’s life who is closely related to you or whose
experience affected you. You should know the person well enough to write
the essay.

Describe what caused the problem, who were involved, what were others’
and your roles in the situation, and if a resolution was reached. This section
is all about your account of your situation and should be no longer than four
paragraphs (3/4 – 1 page).

3. Sociological Imagination: In this third content area, analyze your
personal situation by applying sociological imagination, i.e., examine how
society and social forces affected your situation. This section should be the
most substantial portion of your essay. You should use terms and concepts
from at least 3 different chapters from the textbook, and one sociological
theory.

4. Data/Stats: Utilize at least 2 statistics or research studies from the
textbook or outside sources such as the Galen College online library. The
references should be scholarly and should be relevant to your situation
(E.g., Inclusion of divorce rates in the US if the topic is on Divorce;
inclusion of poverty rates, crime and victimization rates, or suicide rates if
the topic is either on Poverty or Crime). Citing at least one outside
source is required.

5. Conclusion: Write a wrap-up conclusion summarizing the major finding/
themes in your paper. This should be no more than a paragraph.

 

Your essay should be 4-6 pages in length (excluding the title page and the
references page) and should be double-spaced. You will lose points if your
essay is shorter than 4 full pages of content. The font should be 12-point
Calibri or Times New Roman. Use APA format for your entire essay,
including for references and in-text citations and edit your work carefully for
spelling and grammar.

Your essay should be 4-6 pages in length (excluding the title page and the
references page). It should be double-spaced on standard-sized paper
(8.5” x 11”) with a 1” margin on all sides. The font should be 12-point Times
New Roman or Calibri. Use APA formatting throughout your essay and cite
any sources you use.

ethical decision

Eleanor Thompson, a 72-year-old woman, has been battling an aggressive form of ovarian cancer for the past three years. Despite undergoing multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiation, her condition has deteriorated, and she is now experiencing severe pain and suffering. Eleanor’s oncologist, Dr. Samuel Martinez, has presented the family with the option of another experimental treatment, but he has also suggested considering transitioning to palliative care. Eleanor’s family is deeply divided on the decision. Her eldest daughter, Maria, believes that every possible treatment should be pursued, holding onto hope for a miracle. She argues that her mother has always been a fighter and would want to continue the battle against her illness. On the other hand, Eleanor’s son, Michael, feels that his mother has suffered enough. He believes that transitioning to palliative care would allow her to spend her remaining days in comfort and peace. Caught in the middle is Eleanor’s husband of 50 years, Robert. He is torn between wanting to honor his wife’s fighting spirit, desiring to ease her pain, and the painful finality of either decision. The healthcare team must navigate a complex ethical landscape. Beneficence, the principle of doing good, pushes the team to consider what would truly benefit Eleanor in terms of quality of life. Non-maleficence, or “do no harm,” raises questions about the potential suffering Eleanor might endure with further aggressive treatments. Lastly, the principle of justice requires the team to treat Eleanor fairly and equitably, ensuring her needs are met regardless of family disagreements.
Using the case study above, answer the questions below.

  1. Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
    • Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
    • Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
    • Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
      • Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
    • Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
      • Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
  2. Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
    • In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references.
      • Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
      • Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
        • Assess the credibility of the information source.
        • Assess the relevance of the information source.
  3. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
    • Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
    • Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
    • Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
    • Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
  4. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
    • Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
    • Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
    • Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
  5. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
    • Describe the proposed solution.
    • Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
    • Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
  6. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    • Apply the principles of effective composition.
    • Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
  7. Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
    • Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
    • Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.

infographic

infographic on asthma

Discussion

Initial Post Instructions

Congratulations on successfully finishing the last of the A&P series! Over the course of the last eight weeks we’ve discussed the anatomy and physiology of the Digestive, Urinary, and Reproductive systems. We also discussed nutrition, metabolism, human development, and genetics. And since we began our study of the human body in BIOS251, we have continuously referred to a unifying theme in Anatomy and Physiology; that is, the relationship between structure and function. The idea that “form follows function” has been the foundation of our understanding of the human body and how it sustains life. This common thread throughout the A&P series allows us to look at the “big picture”.

If you remember from BIOS251, one of the fundamental principles of Anatomy and Physiology is the interdependence of all body systems and how the proper function of one system is intimately tied to the proper function of other organ systems, and ultimately the overall homeostasis of the human body.

For the Week 8 discussion of BIOS256, I would like you to go back in time. Think back to previous sessions and consider the various organs and organ systems that were discussed in BIOS251, BIOS252, and BIOS255. Choose one of the following organs or organ systems:

  • Integumentary system
  • Skeletal system
  • Joints
  • Muscular system
  • Nervous system
  • Special senses
  • Endocrine system
  • Blood and hemodynamics
  • Cardiovascular system
  • Immune system
  • Respiratory system

After you have chosen one of the above organs or organ systems, discuss how it is intricately connected to any of the major topics that were covered this session in BIOS256. How are these systems integrated? How do they work together to contribute to the overall homeostasis of the human body?

For example, in week 1 and 2 we discussed the digestive system, and the importance of intrinsic factor to red blood cell production. One approach would be to discuss the connection between dietary absorption of intrinsic factor, its relationship to vitamin B12, and the maintenance of a healthy hematocrit.