I am looking for a tutor to rewrite the assignment. I have attached the previous assignment that the tutor had completed, but unfortunately I ended up with an F. I attached the rubric direction. In bold you will find the teacher comment in Bold. I am looking for someone to rewrite the paper in two days.

Here is the teacher feedback:

 Response analyzed a problematic or dated health care policy, explaining its primary purpose and effectiveness. Determined the issues the selected policy poses as it is written and any related ramifications. Response researched the changes needed to update and align the policy with current standards and guidelines. Partially proposed revisions that are based on current identified standards and/or new guidelines. Did not analyze the significance of the selected policy updates as it relates to potential litigation. Lastly, summarized your personal perspective on the revisions as well as any additional changes that should be considered. Missing sub-headings that match the areas of the assignment for format 

1. Policy Analysis
   Introduction
   Organizational policy alignment and adherence to laws and regulations is critical for overall corporate compliance and to decrease organizational risks (patient falls, medication errors, cyber hacks and PHI data breaches, infection control, et cetera). In this assignment, you will select, evaluate, and update one health care provider’s policy related to a significant regulatory risk to the health care organization.
   Instructions 
   Select one of two options:
   Option A
   If you work for a hospital or health care organization you may select a policy that is of interest to you then follow these assignment instructions:
   • Imagine you are a health care administrator at your current employer. Analyze the policy you selected, taking into consideration any recent changes. Evaluate what information and where that information would need to be updated. Propose revisions that are based on current identified standards and/or new guidelines that you have researched in the text or identified in other high-quality sources (that is, journals, government websites, and the like). Analyze the significance of the selected policy updates as it relates to potential litigation. (Why did the policy need updating? What threats do these changes help avoid?) Summarize your perspective on the revisions as well as any additional changes that should be considered. Present your work as an executive summary suitable for distribution to your organization’s board members.
   • Option B
     If you do not work in the industry or do not have access to a health care policy, use the  Hahnemann Falls Policy to complete this assignment. Then follow these assignment instructions:
   • As you can see, this policy was written in 2012. Now, imagine you are a health care administrator working at the health care organization where this policy originates from. Analyze the policy, taking into consideration the changes in HIPAA and PHI since 2012. Evaluate what information and where that information would need to be updated for a current revision of this document. Locate the areas where you would update or add information to this 2012 version. Propose revisions that are based on current identified standards and/or new guidelines that you have researched in the text or identified in other high-quality sources (that is, journals, government websites, and the like). Analyze the significance of the selected policy updates as it relates to potential litigation. (Why did the policy need updating? What threats do these changes help avoid?) Summarize your perspective on the revisions as well as any additional changes that should be considered. Present your work as an executive summary suitable for distribution to your organization’s board members.
   • Your paper should be 3–5 pages long and should include a title page and references for a total of 5–7 pages.
     Strayer Writing Standards
     This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
     Grading Criteria
     The grading criteria for this executive summary is as follows. It must include the elements listed below, so be sure to address each point. You may also want to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed:
   1. Analyze a problematic or dated health care policy, explaining its primary purpose and effectiveness.
   2. Determine the issues the selected policy poses as it is written and any related ramifications.
   3. Research the changes needed to update and align the policy with current standards and guidelines.
   4. Propose revisions that are based on current identified standards and/or new guidelines.
   5. Analyze the significance of the selected policy updates as it relates to potential litigation.
   6. Summarize personal perspective on the revisions as well as any additional changes that should be considered.
   7. Meet clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.
2. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

 

Question 1 (10 marks)

Identify and explain the factors that determine the price elasticity of demand and provide illustrative examples, based on media reports, of the impact of each factor on the demand for a good or service.

Question 2 (10 marks)

Will the Australian economy benefit from President Trump’s protectionist policies? Provide illustrative examples from media reports to support your answer and ensure that you consider the concept of comparative advantage.

 

Select two of the three cases presented below and prepare a three-pages written analysis of each case (six pages total). These case studies provide real-world application to concepts you have studied during this course.

Case 1: Government Spending and Taxation

Read Special Topic 1, pages 404 through 418 of Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice. You may also want to review Chapters 5 and 6 as the role of the government and the political process were covered in detail.

Using the Government Spending and Taxation case, Chapters 5 and 6, the knowledge you have gained in this course, as well as at least three additional credible resources, analyze the case by addressing the following:

· Describe how government spending and the composition of the government changed in recent decades. In other words, in what areas has the government cut spending and in what areas has the government increased spending in recent decades?

· Determine if this change in government spending and composition will help Americans achieve a higher living standard. Be sure to support all opinions with research.

· Assess if democracy can survive if the majority of the U.S. citizens pay little or nothing in taxes while benefiting directly from a higher level of government spending. Why or why not?

· Propose the composition of government, government spending, and taxation that you believe would work best. Be sure to be specific and support your proposal with research.

Case 2: The Economics of Social Security

Read the Special Topic 2, pages 419 through 428 of Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice.

Using the Economics of Social Security case, the knowledge you have gained in this course, as well as at least three additional credible resources, analyze the case by addressing the following:

· Explain how the Social Security system’s basic principles are different from private insurance.

· Determine how Social Security affects the economic well-being of blacks, relative to whites and Hispanics.

· Assess if the current Social Security system promotes income equality. Why or why not?

· Propose how the Social Security system could be modernized to ensure long-term solvency and fairness in distribution. Be specific and support your proposal with research.

Case 3: Keynes and Hayek: Contrasting Views on Sound Economics and the Role of Government (Case 4 in the text)

Read the Special Topic 2, pages 439 through 444. You may also want to review Chapters 11 and 12 of Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice as the role of government and different views of government intervention were discussed.

Using the Keynes and Hayek: Contrasting Views on Sound Economics and the Role of Government case, Chapters 11 and 12, the knowledge you have gained in this course, as well as at least three additional credible resources, analyze the case by addressing the following:

· Describe briefly how Keynes’s and Hayek’s economic theory and views differ.

· Contrast the two views on how savings may be harmful or beneficial to the economy.

· Compare the two views on whether the economy would fluctuate more or less over the business cycle without government intervention. Be sure to address both the inherent stability of the market economy as well as the impact of government interventions to steer the economy.

· Hypothesize on which economist theory, Keynes or Hayek, you believe is more accurate and why. Be specific and support your hypothesis with research.

Your Cases: Applying Economics to the Real-World Final Project:

· Must be seven double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style 

Each chosen case should be covered in approximately three pages for a total paper of six pages.

· Must include a separate title page with the following:

o Title of paper

o Student’s name

o Course name and number

o Instructor’s name

o Date submitted

· Must use at least three credible sources in addition to the course text for each case. 

· Avoid over-dependence on direct quotes. Direct quotes are a great way to strengthen our assertions and provide support. However, be sure to avoid using excessive direct quotes in lieu of original thought. Direct quotes will not meet the requirement for analysis, application, and critical thinking. 

· Please ensure to not overuse direct quote so that you can avoid losing points for this. 

There should be six full pages total not including cover and reference pages.